Talk:Snap
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is part of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Also a dirivative of position. I think the 5th.
[edit] sections
I do not believe that all the topics covered in the computing aspect fit to science and engineering -- specifically a search engine would actually fit closer to a product than a science/engineering concept and some people might argue whether a specific protocol is a product or an engineering issue. (ie that protocols in general are computer science/engineering but that a specific protocol might be considered a product to solve a particular system issue.) As a result I think is appropriate to keep the IT and Science aspects more separate. Nashikawa 23:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Many very small sections worsen reaidng and searching, and generally discouraged in wikipedia.. `'mikka (t) 01:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree completly with you my friend!!
What about snapping your fingers. Is there no insanely in-depth article on the mechanics of the snap? As far as I know, this is the origin of the word, shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere?
[edit] Snap-on
Why was Snap-on , the tool manufacturer removed? It has an article in Wikipedia...why not reference it here?
- It does not seem that a reader searching for Snap-on is likely to make the mistake of looking for Snap instead. This page is to help resolve very frequent confusions or dual uses of the same word. The word Snap-on is unique and distinctive and is unlikely to have the problem of being mixed up with some other snap-on with different meaning, or being mixed up with snap itself. EdJohnston 16:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Because it is not called "Snap". `'Míkka 16:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
