User talk:Skipsievert
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! TheThingy Talk 19:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
READ THIS.
WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
Contents |
[edit] Formal request for mediation filed
Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Technocracy movement 2. Sign at the bottom to begin mediation.-Wafulz (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding this edit. In two sentences or less, summarize what you think the "additional issues" are. Neither I nor the mediator will be willing to spend several hours deciphering your essays.-Wafulz (talk) 18:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Is there a time limit on a decision on the article ? Do I have to make a choice now or can I wait a week or what ? skip sievert (talk) 23:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Request for mediation not accepted
 |
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Technocrac movement. |
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
[edit] AfD nomination of Network of European Technocrats
An editor has nominated Network of European Technocrats, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network of European Technocrats and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Technocracy movement
Greetings Skip, and apologies for removing your comment from my talkpage. However, I only tolerate messages that are brief, to the point, and either address some aspect of my editing or request something. With regards to the technocracy movement article, I take your point that the reference may have been altered, but that is easily proven using the Wayback Machine. As regards the see also link to J. Fresco, the question is whether or not J. Fresco is a related topic of the technocracy movement. As he is a former member still active and influential in the field, this seems obviously to be the case, regardless of his current affiliation. Regards, Skomorokh 15:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that lengthy post on your talk page Skomorokh. I felt I should update you and perhaps got carried away a little. I noticed that you had not edited that particular page recently and gave no discussion for your actions except in your edit. Technocracy movement. As to Fresco in my opinion he is not connected to a Technocracy movement. That concept seems to be a construct to enforce the idea that there is a Technocracy movement by the NET group. I would note also that J. Fresco would not consider himself to be a member of this movement or associated now with the Technocracy movement. He has made it a point to disavow any connection to the group or movement. Also the NET group can say they formed at any particular time and it is hard to say if that is accurate or not. They did become a registered group for tax purposes in 2006. That seems like a start point for them in a civil legal sense. skip sievert (talk) 15:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Technocracy Study Course
I have nominated Technocracy Study Course, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technocracy Study Course. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 12:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Technocratic views of the Price system
An editor has nominated Technocratic views of the Price system, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technocratic views of the Price system and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Technate
An editor has nominated Technate, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
