User talk:Shirimasen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] re; My Generation Cover
I will see what i can do. The cover is pretty beat up, having traveled around the world with me since i got it in England in [I think} 1965. i had to scan it four times and then put the four together, so it's not a perfect fit. However if i still have the scan I'll see what i can do. Einar
- well that did not take too long. I'll have an improved version up shortly. Check it out. Einar
-
- Okay, J-L: Been there done that. However, and here is where you come in, i am a bit vague about how to do the copyright blurb for album covers, so if you can check it out, and then go "Tisk, Tisk" and then fix it, well that would be good. have a great 2005 - and, in a little known rumor - check out the March 2005 Wired Magazine [due out the middle of Feb.] . it is supposed to have an article about wikipedia
- Thanks for doing the copyright for me. I have been up for 22 hours, including driving across a large chunk of America and am WASTED. However I wanted to check in. How is/are your college apps going? I am happy owning my WHO album and am thrilled to meet someonme who appreciates it. My high school band used to do several songs from that album but that was long before you were even born. Life is Good. Einar
-
-
- Well here I am - again, wiped out after driving home from Phoenix. hmmmmmmmm, there seems to be a pattern developing. i sort of dropped out of the Who after Moon died. My [ex] wife was lucky enough to see them do Tommy in Detroit long, long ago. Good luck with your college applications. Courtland NY has a special meaning to me because I was popped for hitch-hiking on the expressway there in 1969 and made to spend $5 of my total $10 to buy a bus ticket out of town - which got me to Bimghamton at 3 AM. But that's another story for another day. Einar
-
[edit] more from Einar
I got an email from someone yesterday who had seen the Wired article and contacted me because he lives in Taos, the next town over [well, sort of] His copy was the first I'd seen of the article. which I think is pretty good.
Boy, I was looking at your Kinks stuff, wishing that the covers of my three - the first three - kinks albums were in better shape. Such records as I have have gone through a lot, including a flood and a lot of ice induced water damage. Still, mayby I'll try and PS them, see what I get.
If you want a nice photo related task, try getting copyrights to some Tina Modoti pictures, both ones of her by Edward weston, or ones by her. Just a thought.
Meanwhile, how is the college quest coming along? as I recall you are headed . . . . . . . . ....... somewhere soon? life is Good, Carptrash 03:30, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Kinks and other things
Every time I look at my tattered Kinks albums I flinch and can't go on. A note about the beat up Zombis cover - it was actuslly nibbled on by mice. Hmmmm. I recently ran into a chap [on the internet] who had been to the same Zombies concert that I had . . . . 1967 in Manila. Big world, but small something else. Meanwhile though, thanks for your good work organizing the Aleijadinho pictures. I am not very good at doing that and need to look at your codes [or whatever they are called] and get a clue. Meanwhile I am working on a couple more photographically explosive articles, so don't go away yet. Carptrash 08:03, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cortland, NY
Although you probably will not find this in the Cortland NY article, if there is one, in 1969 I was hitch-hiking from Toranto to Washington DC. Midnight or so found me in Cortland. I was picked up by the police [with $10 in my pocket] for illegally thumbing on the freeway. They took me to the local lock-up, fined me $5 and made me buy a $3 bus ticket to Binghamton, the nearest town. I arrived there at 3 AM or so, with $2 in my pocket. I found the train yard and hopped a ride, ending up somewhere near the NY/PA border where another cop - but that's another story for another day. And I am happy to hear that you like my stuff. Do what ever you see fit 'cause it will only get better because of it. Carptrash 08:42, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] My God S-Man
Are you a man or a machine or a force of nature? You are combing through my stuff and making it look soooooo good. Thanks very much. I have decided to email the Center for Creative Photography in Tucson AZ and try and pry some Tina Modotti photographs out of them. They have pictures by her AND pictures of her [by Weston]. While I'm talking to them I'll do a pitch for some of their Margrethe Mather stuff too. If they say "Yes" I guess I'll ned to write an article on her too. Might anyway. Carptrash 06:51, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- WOW thanks for the star, and yup, I've never had one before, and they say that you never forget the first time. Yes, the CCP owns a large number of Weston stuff. I'm sure all of his shots are owned by someone. Are there Weston pics posted here? I don't thinks that this is good. I'm on my way Carptrash
[edit] Pattie & John Waddell
That thing is indeed a "?" I knew some of the names of the models of those works and some I did not. I was not sure if I should include the names at all, but since Waddell usually DID, I figured that I would too, and did the best i could. I you wish, remove the "?" and if someone writes in and says 'Hey, that's me and I'm Sandie" well then we change it. Your call. Carptrash 04:10, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Meanwhile i am very close to adding more pictures to some of those sculptors. So, well see what i make of what you have set up.
[edit] It's too bad
that you just noticed Patti at John Waddell because I visited him a week ago at his home/studio near Cornville, Arizona and I could have asked him. I am pretty sure it is Patti, but I'll try and figure it out from a book. Oh yes, If you put something, anything, on your user page your user:name will appear in blue rather than in red, which I think is much better. Carptrash 14:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Time, time, What is Time"
"Time, time, what is time? The Swiss manufacture it, Italians squander it, French hoard it, the Americans say it is money and the Hindus say it does not exist. from Beat the Devil.
Nice to hear from you. I did not ask Waddell about Patti because he is not hooked up to the internet at all so I had no way of getting to that issue.
Even if I had thought of it. I too have backed off wikipedia. I now am involved in a similar project (well, sort of) only both my opinion and original research are highly valued, so guess whare I'd rather be. I am interested in a bulding in Cortland NY, and if you are still there you might check it out in your spare time. try the local history museum for example. There are intersting carvings on it and i need to know who the architect was and if possible, the carver or sculptor.
Of course this is just a thought. I am used to "NO>" So how have you been? Einar aka Carptrash 05:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RogerDaltrey.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RogerDaltrey.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ++aviper2k7++ 04:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JohnEntwistle.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JohnEntwistle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ++aviper2k7++ 04:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bee_Gees_Stayin_Alive.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bee_Gees_Stayin_Alive.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:BoDiddley.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:BoDiddley.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Whosnext.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Whosnext.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mudhoney album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mudhoney album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
{{subst:di-undefined-notice|1=Band of Gypsys album.jpg}} After Midnight 0001 19:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Band of Gypsys album.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Band of Gypsys album.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 19:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Intelligent Qube.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Intelligent Qube.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:U2 Pride.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:U2 Pride.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The animals.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The animals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The kinks arthur album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The kinks arthur album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thewho whoareyou album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thewho whoareyou album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bruce springsteen tracks.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bruce springsteen tracks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hallowed Ground album.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hallowed Ground album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Thewho whoareyou album.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Thewho whoareyou album.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - AWeenieMan (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bruce springsteen mtv plugged.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bruce springsteen mtv plugged.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bruce springsteen philadelphia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bruce springsteen philadelphia.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:The who sell out album back.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The who sell out album back.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
