User talk:Scog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Scog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Kusma (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your article B. E. J. Pagel! I have renamed it to Bernard Pagel following our naming conventions. His homepage also seems to use this version of the name. Happy editing, Kusma (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Concerning Audrey C. Delsanti
See the article's talk page. Urhixidur (talk) 04:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Special Barnstar
 |
The Special Barnstar | |
| For doing exactly the right thing in taking Stephen Thorpe to AfD |
Philip Trueman (talk) 11:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Leo Mayer
In response to your comment to me at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo J. Meyer (2nd nomination) what I was getting at was at the time I placed my vote there as no indication that a DRV had occurred - the information in the "past nominations box" did not include any reference to DRV. That is the fault of the nominator. Another user has subsequently updated the box to reflect the DRV and I have withdrawn my vote. 23skidoo (talk) 21:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wolffenstein
Thanks, but you betraied him on a whole milenium of his life ;-) --Stone (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Community Outreach
Ooops! THANK YOU...I use Twinkle...it usually takes care of everything...and then opens the AfD page. Thanks again! LegoTech·(t)·(c) 02:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Journal of Physics D
You have reverted my prod tag, and I have since reverted back. While the journal may be legitimate and widely cited, the article does not show notability, or use any secondary sources. The only external links, go back to the article itself. A random passer by such as myself sees this article as a blatant advertisement and nothing more. I would appreciate a discussion on the articles talk page (which I have already started), to resolve this issue. I would not oppose to removing the tag if any of these issues are resolved. In the end, its all about improvement of Wikipedia. Here is the link to the talk page. Thanks. Angrymansr (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AFD of Steven M. Greer
You wrote:
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that you've forgotten to state a reason for deletion in your AFD nomination of Steven M. Greer. Scog (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I did put it in, but for some reason it did not take. How do I put into the AfD now? I would appreciate your help, because getting WP forms to work for me is a chronic problem (I admit to being computer impaired) Malcolm Schosha (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Actually I might have gotten it worked out...I hope. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 20:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] A request as I wade through 500+ names in a RfD
I was afraid of multiple edit conflicts as we try to peruse all of the names in the list, but please do not unstrike those that others have struck. Certainly we don't want to risk an edit war while we are trying to manage the unmanageable, and it only makes sense that if we assume each other's good faith we can get this all done. Thanks! B.Wind (talk) 08:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Apologies - some of the conflicts I misread as removals. 500+ article lots are extremely awkward to update, let alone peruse. B.Wind (talk) 08:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
Hello, Scog, and thank you for your recent participation in my RfA, which was closed per WP:NOTNOW after reaching a vote tally of 5/15/2. While I am disappointed in the outcome, I understand that it - as well as the comments left by yourself and others - was in the best interests of Wikipedia at this time. I plan to take everything that was written to heart and improve myself here on Wikipedia with a goal of perhaps accepting a nomination again in the future, should someone choose to nominate me. As a way of gathering further feedback, I have created a page in my user space for other editors to leave comments about things that they might have observed during my RfA and to continue my "education process," as it may be considered. If you would like to contribute to that page, it may be found here. Again, thank you for participating and I appreciate your comments! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
