Talk:Scott Pilgrim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

[edit] Knives Chau

Just added some more info on the character Knives. Don't know if it's completely necceJackorKnave (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)ssary, but it does seem to be a development in the overall stroy.

I'm actually going to remove it because it's technically speculative. I think others noticed it as well, but due to Wiki's policies against speculative "information," it shouldn't be on Knives' or Stills' character descriptions. If there's a summary of the events of issue 4, then the indicators can be described, but I don't think a written conclusion should be there. That way, it leaves readers of Wiki with as much indication as we have.Luminum (talk) 03:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Seems fair enough to me. I wasn't sure if it belonged there.JackorKnave (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Locations

Can someone explain why the Locations section needs such a detailed list? I think the introductory two sentences of the section are totally valid, and could probably expanded into a full section with some references (I think there even was some article dealing especially with the fact that SP was set in Toronto), but I don't see the point of listing every place that appears in the series. Some examples would easily suffice. In its current state, the section seems somewhat off-topic and pointless. --Fritz S. (Talk) 08:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)