Science & Justice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Science & Justice is a British forensics journal.
One notable article was an analysis by Dr. Donald B. Thomas. [1] In it he disputed the conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) that the House Select Committee on Assassinations finding of a fourth shot in acoustical evidence was incorrect. A later article (Science and Justice 45(4):207-26 (2005)) by Ralph Linsker, Richard Garwin, Herman Chernoff, Paul Horowitz and Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr. re-analyzed the acoustic synchronization evidence, rebutting Thomas' 2001 argument as well as correcting errors in the 1982 NAS report, while supporting the NAS report's finding that the sounds alleged to be gunshots occurred about a minute after the assassination. Followup Science and Justice articles have been published (Correspondence by Thomas, Reply by Linsker et al.).
[edit] External links
 |
This science article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
