Talk:San Diego Free Speech Fight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
Extensive revision for point of view and poor writing style is now pretty much completed. This note is likewised revised. Richard Myers 09:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Removed POV template.
-
- There is still a possible issue with "local 13" in the text; IWW "locals" were, and are, normally referred to as branches, not locals. However, there were a few cases of IWW branches being referred to as locals. Issue is not yet determined; confirmation sought. Richard Myers 10:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- You've done a damn good job. Great work. Kudos! Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 10:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Orphan status
Seriously, the article is still orphaned. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 10:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- It does have a few links now.--Carabinieri 20:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've added a link from Reitman. I'm sure there are others that can also be added. I'm not through with this article, because i think it still needs some fixing. Richard Myers 04:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lead
The lead section needs to be revamped too. Currently it kind of gives a background, while it should summarize the rest of the article.--Carabinieri 20:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anarchist template
A couple of us who edit organized labor articles believe that the anarchist template in this article — included in addition to links providing information on anarchism — gives undue weight to anarchism in an article that is more immediately associated with organized labor.
We discussed it briefly here:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Organized_Labour#New_type_of_template_--_do_we_need_one_too.3F
I am willing to listen to discussion from other points of view, or to other possible solutions, before removing the template. Richard Myers (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
