Talk:Sa'd ibn Mua'dh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Salafs article assessment section, a WikiProject related to the Salaf. It has been rated - on the quality scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (nations and regions): Middle Eastern military history task force

	Middle Ages Portal Sa'd ibn Mua'dh is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

[edit] Banu Qurayza agreed to his appointment

Str1977, can you please justify your removal of content sourced to 5 reliable sources? Thanks.Bless sins (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, I had a look and found nothing new. Please present the four other sources either here or on the BQ talk page. Str1977 ^(talk) 18:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

"Nothing new". Well ofcourse! These sources have been around for years, and are based upon sources that have been around for centuries. They are certainly "not new". Do you dispute any of the five sources' reliability?Bless sins (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

"Nothing new" on this talk page. You reverted me, directing me to this talk page but you didn't post anything here. Now heed my request, if you will. Str1977 ^(talk) 18:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I need to know what to respond to. Are you claiming the sources are unreliable? If not, what are you claiming? Why are you removing the sources? You have not explained why, and I don't really know what is it you want from me.Bless sins (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)