Talk:Roth 401(k)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the Project's priority scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

[edit] Corporate Partners?

What is meant by that? If it's a list of companies known to offer the roth 401(k) option, state that, if not, state what it is. - Taxman ^Talk 19:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External link

Re-added my link roth-401k-forum.com to Roth 401k. Can you please explain why you keep deleting it? You keep in the link to roth401k.com but take mine out? My site has more information, more visitors and more original content. I added that link way back in December 2005 well before anyone even knew what a Roth 401k was and certainly before the link to roth401k.com was put in there. It was reviewed back then by several people and they all agreed it was ok. Now you come along all delete happy and take it out. How can you justify taking my link out and leaving roth401k.com link? Even some of the content written on the Roth 410k page was taken from my site. My site is useful to anyone who has questions about Roth 401k. Please explain.

I removed it based on WP:EL and the number of times it had been removed by other editors. That and the fact that it is your site indicate it is against what WP:EL is for. The other listed sites have better and more definitive information with less of an attempt at advertising. The fact that you've re-added it without discussing first along with the other facts shows that the site is clearly more in your self interest to be listed than Wikipedia's. And trust me, 2005 was not well before anyone new what it was. Many of us caught it in the conference reports before EGTRRA 2001 was passed. Finally where is this link to several people reviewing the link and agreeing to include it? - Taxman ^Talk 22:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)