Template talk:Rights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Order
While I know that its alphabetical, does it strike anyone else as ironic that Youth rights are at the bottom of this template? Does that reek of adultcentrism? With that and Animal rights being first, maybe this template only illustrates the reason why there is a 10/1 ratio of animal shelters over women's shelters in the US. Just a thought. - Freechild 15:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
That's interesting, and really quite unfortunate about the women's shelters ratio. As far as the template goes, though, the real question is how *else* would you order them? Alphabetical order is good because it implies non-biased-ness; once you try to order them based on importance, NPOV would go right out the window, probably. Just a thought. --71.17.49.67 21:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
