ebooksgratis.com

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
User talk:ReviewDude - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:ReviewDude

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] Before You Leave a Comment...

Please remember:

  • If you are abusive, or leave a personal attack in a comment, it will be removed.
  • Comments that are not signed (~~~~ on the end) will not be responded to.
  • Add a new comment using the '+' button at the top of the page, not by editing an existing one.
  • Editing this notice or any existing comments (except your own) will result in any further comments of yours being removed.

Other than that, talk away!




Thanks! NawlinWiki 17:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

  • No problem! Nice to have at least something on my talk page too! --ReviewDude

[edit] Cheers

Thanks for fixing my image at Norton Internet Security[1]

[edit] Removing redlinks

Hello! Is there a reaon you are removing redlinks from lots of articles? Wikipedia:Red link indicates that redlinks are acceptable when there is a good chance that an article for these subjects will later be created. The redlinks you removed in e.g. Edgar Pierre Jacobs and at first glance most of the other articles you did this to, were perfectly acceptable. It is much easier to have the redlinks there, so you can see when planning to make an article what already links there. Otherwise you have to search for it, which is harder and might well miss some things. I'll revert your changes at Edgar Pierre Jacobs but leave the other ones alone, since they are harder to judge by me, but I don't think this is the most useful editing, and can be annoying to other editors who had a reason for creating those redlinks. Fram 10:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

  • I see your point, and I'll try to look out for that in future. However, a great deal of what I do is in spelling errors etc. I'll stop removing redlinks if you want :-) --ReviewDude 10:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD for Blame

I have unlinked your AfD notice on Blame as you did not complete the AfD process by listing the article in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 January 30. You are welcome to reinstate the Afd notice on the article once you complete the AfD listing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I've deleted the AfD page for Blame as a bit of housekeeping. When you return, if you would still like to pursue the AfD, you can recreate the AfD from scratch. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -