User talk:RetroS1mone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Original founding directors of ALRA.
You claim: - "I don't think a school prospectus is a reliable source." How so? Surely a school knows who its Board of Directors is? Not only is it a direct source but by law (in the UK) the information MUST BE CORRECT. To name directors who are not in such a position is a criminal offense under the Company (Disclosures) Act (1985/6 revision and 2002 revision) which also requires the propectus includes the company ID number and the VAT number. As such it is a legal document.
Disclosure of names of directors 8.—(1) Where a company’s business letter includes the name of any director of that company, other than in the text or as a signatory, the letter must disclose the name of every director of that company. (2) In paragraph (1), “name” has the following meanings— (a)in the case of a director who is an individual, “name” has the meaning given in section 163(2) of the Act; and (b)in the case of a director who is a body corporate or a firm that is a legal person under the law by which it is governed, “name” means corporate name or firm name.
Further particulars to appear in business letters, order forms and websites 7.—(1) Every company shall disclose the particulars set out in paragraph (2) on— (a)its business letters; (b)its order forms; and (c)its websites. (2) The particulars are— (a)the part of the United Kingdom in which the company is registered; (b)the company’s registered number; (c)the address of the company’s registered office; (d)in the case of a limited company exempt from the obligation to use the word “limited” as part of its registered name under section 30 of the Companies Act 1985(3) or article 40 of the Companies (Northern) Ireland Order 1986(4), the fact that it is a limited company; (e)in the case of a community interest company which is not a public company, the fact that it is a limited company; and (f)in the case of an investment company within the meaning of section 833 of the Act, the fact that it is such a company.
HOW MANY SOURCES USED IN WIKIPEDIA CARRY A JAIL SENTENCE IF FORGED OR INCORRECT?
If this reference is wrong simply look up the public record of companies (UK) and you can then have criminal charges brought against me. If you don't do this kindly stop rewriting history and distorting this article or I will ask that you be removed as an editor.Aimulti (talk) 03:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Aimulti, I have nominated your autobiography for deletion. You are too close to the subject for WP:COI and given your unique situation I think it is for the best. If you are really interested for future reference, read WP:PSTS. RetroS1mone (talk) 03:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/draft/ukdsi_9780110806570_en_1Aimulti (talk) 03:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Every item not referenced has been removed. My I ask what is your grudge against me. The AIDS debate? I guess so.Aimulti (talk) 04:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of User:RetroS1mone
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ANI
You need to be made aware of this discussion at ANI. Toddst1 (talk) 08:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mark Hanau, you will be blocked from editing. Aimulti (talk) 04:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC) (please stop removing content)WP:EDITWAR
Two more published references with visual scans (for verification purposes only) added both confirming Mark Hanau was Chairman of the Board. ISBN number for one provided.Aimulti (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] We are in agreement. DELETE THIS SILLY BIO
Delete the Mark Hanau article. I am sick and tired of this pathetic game. Reference: - I never did anything in this bio and all references are pure fabrications. Sorrel Carson was not my mother, John Hanau was not my father and Sasha Hanau is not my daughter. I have never done a single thing, of note in my life, and played no role in ALRA. This article is without merit. DELETE IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
P.S. It is common knowledge that dissidents have no rights and have never done anything of note. Every fool knows that.!Aimulti (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mark Hanau's band management
Mark Hanau's involvement as manager of Curved Air and Saturnalia is not in dispute (both band's first albums state his involvement on their covers or in the inlays) so why are you seeking to delete all mentions of him from their articles ? RGCorris (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Primary sources and wp:re. The articles have source problems, that is bad enough for the bands itself and worse for people that are not in the band. There should be independent sources if some thing is notable, fan sites, personal sites, commercial sites are not independent sources. RetroS1mone talk 23:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- The cover, liner notes, etc. of a record album would certainly be a reliable source. There may be other reasons to delete references to Mark from an article, but sourcing does not seem to be the issue here. (I note that Mark should not be inserting references to himself into Wikipedia articles. Editors, notable and otherwise, are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves.)--Srleffler (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lenticular printing
Hi. I restored and cleaned up the history section at Lenticular printing. Hopefully it is sufficiently less spammy now. The deletion of this section by several editors was really not appropriate. Material should have instead been pruned and edited to make the section comply with WP's guidelines. There was a lot of good content there. See also Talk:Lenticular printing.
[edit] Morgellons
RetroS1mone, while I admire your enthusiasm for editing, I believe that violations of WP:NPOV, and WP:V have been introduced by your edits of the Morgellons article. As discussed on the talk page, stay-at-home mother is not an appropriate description of Leitao's electron microscopist and immunohistochemist experience in relation to the topic of the article. "Lab technician" is POV and not supported by sources. "Son's toy microscope", and "he did say that several features of the case" is WP:OR. The use of special formatting to call attention to quoted POV material is not NPOV, and using disclaimers and WP:WTA to diminish views held by Morgellons proponents does not fairly represent their viewpoints. Adding material that has nothing to do with Morgellons to add weight to the Role of the internet is also not NPOV. You appear to be an intelligent and experienced editor, please cease editing that violates Wiki policies. Thank you. Ward20 (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Discussion at NPOV Noticeboard here. Ward20 (talk) 02:20, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
