Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/The Negotiator
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] The Negotiator
| main edit links history watch Filed: 16:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
- The Negotiator (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Professional Deletionist (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Snakese (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Seriousspender (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence:
Professional Deletionist's edits were: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Seriousspender's edits were: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
While The Negotiator, Professional Deletionist, and Snakese were already blocked for sockpuppetry, I suspect that Seriousspender is a new sock puppet that the former user The Negotiator is controlling.
Seriousspender's contributions are very similar to the blocked account Professional Deletionist's contributions in terms of disrupting various articles and redirects, particularly ones related to RuneScape, even if the redirects were specific for the RuneScape game.
Diff #1 from Professional Deletionist and Diff #7 from Seriousspender are very alike in the same goal on the same article.
Diff #3 from Professional Deletionist and Diff #8 from Seriousspender also appear to have the same goal on the same article.
Diff #6 from Professional Deletionist and Diff #11 from Seriousspender not only appears to have the same goal, but also made the exact same redirect.
All evidence used were in relation to RuneScape, but there were apparently disruption in other similar topics according to the contributions. IAmSasori (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Original case listed. IAmSasori (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Clerk note: per request code F, the block log of the master account is located here. However, I have observed that it is unclear whether this account is blocked as a result of a community-based decision, as outlined in the request code, or otherwise; I will leave that particular decision to the handling Checkuser. Anthøny 17:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Inconclusive since the old data has almost all expired, there was only a microsample left which isn't enough to get a conclusive result. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
