ebooksgratis.com

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
Talk:Reggae - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Reggae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reggae article.
Article policies
Archives: 1
Reggae was a good article, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Delisted version: November 8, 2006
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia The spoken word version of this article is part of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, an attempt to produce recordings of Wikipedia articles. To participate, visit the project page.

Contents

[edit] Archives

[edit] Reggae in other countries

I have issue with the lack of mention of reggae in and around the world. Reggae is very prominent in America and in some places in some Latin American countries such as Guatemala and Costa Rica. I have not been to Europe but I'm sure it must be important there as well. In the reggae box to the right of the article under regional scenes there is an almost total lack of countries that have a decent sized population that listens to reggae. I am unsure as of yet how to change this. If someone has the time and know how they might consider adding some appropriate countries. Many things should be added to the article to properly show reggae's influence on the non African/Caribbean world. --Migglesworth 22:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


Ah, I see I was in error about my last discussion post above. I did not realize that the regional scenes encompassed something that could be the equivalent to a genre of reggae. As the reggae that is in the U.S. and Latin America couldn't be classified as it's own regional genre of reggae I sort of revoke my last post. I do still believe that more mention needs be input to reggae in other countries though. I will contribute as much as I am able to this. --Migglesworth 23:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


I deleted the edit involving U.S. Virgin Island reggae as it was simply copied and pasted from the Music of the Virgin Islands page. There are proper links in the reggae box about reggae in other countries. including the US Virgin Islands. The reggae page is relatively concise and this seemed very out of place. --Migglesworth 19:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Audio

The guy who reads the audio about Reggae is unbearable. I can't stand him any more.... I mean the way he speaks. It's not formal at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elchafa (talk • contribs)

I think he's trying to be funny. But I guess you can't complain unless you record a better version... #29 (talk) 10:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, his exasperation and sarcasm and off-key singing are too much and unprofessional, I agree it has to go. But if I ever happen to win $100, I will buy some good microphone equipment for my computer and make a new one myself! By the way, I have selected this article for a "quality drive" competition, so I will be working hard to try and raise the quality rating significantly over the next few days... --Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 16:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Good Article

I just read this through the for the first time. It reads like a good article to me. Only nitpick might be the see also section. Wwwhatsup (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Endgame

The 'See also' and 'External links' sections, with the exception of the Jammin Reggae Archive, are essentially linkspam. I believe linking to some appropriate categories might be of more value. They could be added to the Reggae Template that appears at the bottom, and the 'See Also' dispensed with altogether. Wwwhatsup (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree, but I personally don't know a lot of the different categories on Wikipedia, other than the obvious ones. Spylab (talk) 21:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Audio samples

Buffalo Soldier is a particularly poor audio example to be the only one in the article. There is some quite detailed discussion of aspects of the music above. Surely audio examples could be found to illustrate that? Wwwhatsup (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

  • There should probably be a few samples or none at all, because one song cannot represent the various styles of reggae music. If you, or someone else knows the policies and procedures for posting song samples in Wikipedia articles, I encourage you to find samples that represent various time periods and styles of reggae. Spylab (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Examples for early reggae (e.g. one of the handful of songs that lay claim to being the first reggae song), (70's) roots reggae (but not Marley - he wasn't really representative), late 70s/early 80s dancehall, and digital reggae ("Under Me Sleng Teng" seems an obvious choice) would represent the important phases.--Michig (talk) 21:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Guidelines are on Wikipedia:Music_samples. For fair-use to apply the songs must specifically illustrate points in the article. Wwwhatsup (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
This could be a problem with the article as it stands, as it's a bit weak in terms of discussing the progression of reggae from early reggae through to the slower-paced roots era, the change to dancehall, then the digital revolution and ragga.--Michig (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of reggae music festivals

The list of Reggae#Reggae music festivals continues to be damaged (in good faith) by Spylab (talk · contribs), under the auspices of Wikipedia guidelines. The guidelines relevant to list organization are here. This list makes no sense and is useless when it is alphabetized by festival name, because reggae festivals are not uniformly named - some start with the word Reggae, some start with the location, and some have an unrelated name. The list should be grouped by location (for example, by country, as I have done), the location sections should be alphabetized, and the festivals within each section should be alphabetized. EAE (Holla!) 03:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

  • I added a link to List of reggae festivals to the See Also section and moved all relevant content to that page. Therefore the list and subheadings won't clutter up the reggae article. Spylab (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Good move. Wwwhatsup (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Buffalo Soldier.ogg

Image:Buffalo Soldier.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] External links

These links fail the following criteria from WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided:

In light of this, I removed all of them and the External links section to boot. I don't think this article needs external links at all. EAE (Holla!) 23:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit war over para split

I originally wrote the two paragraphs in question and I knew what I was doing. One paragraph is about the derivation assuming ot comes from streggae and includes the quote. It may look like only one sentence, because the embedded quote is in a block quote, but keep looking.

The derivations pointing to Latin rex and derived forms should be kept separate from the paragraph on streggae. This has got to be one of the contenders for lamest edit war, but I see no improvement to the readability by lumping these two distinct paragraphs. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 01:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion for adding the Reggae-Auction link to the external link section

Hello, i'm making this suggestion for someone to add an external link section on the reggae page, with the linkhttp://www.reggae-auction.com, i really think that the reggae auction website has it's place under the links of this page as it represents not only buying / selling activity wich can be useless for many, but a lot of long lost recordings and usefull informations as also the possibility to hear those rare and hard to find reggae records. The Website provides a wide aperture on the reggae music scene from all eras with concrete content and extensive media representation. Please take that into consideration as clearly the site provides usefull content on long lost reggae materials?

Beeing affiliated with the site as it's owner, i can't add myself the link as it is a conflict of interest to do so.

Best Regards, Renaud —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reggae auction (talk • contribs) 07:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • I looked at the site and all I see is buying and selling, so that does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for outside sources. That link would probably be considered spam.Spylab (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JAH Throne music

The article intro currently includes this line: "The music style is sometimes referred to as JAH Throne music in Rastafari contexts. In the Caribbean, the heavier forms of reggae are also sometimes known as Rockers music."

I've never heard reggae being referred to as "JAH Throne music", and a quick Google search reveals only 451 hits. Rockers refers to a "sound" or a sub-genre that was popular in the later 70s in Jamaica, but it is not something that merits a mention in the introduction of a whole music genre. If no one objects, I'm going to remove it. Gaaarg (talk) 04:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

So, now you're deleting information on the basis that there are 451 google hits, and you've never heard of it? Gee, if there are only 451 google hits and you've never heard of it, I guess that means it must not really exist then, right? Sorry, but I DO object, especially part of what you deleted included a reference. This ref was not always in the intro and might not need to be there, but please do not undo the hard work others have done in complying with all the references and citations requests, just because in your perception of experience you are not familiar with something. Thankyou. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 12:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I am going to go with Gaaarg on this one. This page is intended to be a general introduction to reggae. I do not feel that having the term JAH THRONE (although it may be a perfectly valid term in reggae), in the page would lead folks in the right direction. I think we should keep it out for now. With all due respect, please post your motivation for including this term along with the term "rockers". Regarding the comment on citations and the amount of work involved, sometimes it is hard work conforming to the standards of this encyclopedia and sometimes it gets erased outright. Just because something is difficult doesn't give it precedence to stay in the page. After your motivation is posted and it seems that the page would be lacking without term JAH THRONE, then it should be reinstated.--Migglesworth (talk) 19:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The info that was Reliably Sourced should not have ben blanked just because some have a low opinion of it. There has to be a very good reason for blanking out information from Reliable Sources, and "because I / we don't think it's important" usually doesn't cut it, being of course a POV. You are free to look for contradictory references if there are any, but do not blank the ones that are there. This is an encyclopedia that aims to be comprehensive, so we are trying to include MORE reliable information about the subject, not less. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I've looked a bit for sources that would say reggae music is known as "JAH Throne music" and I can't find any. The term is not mentioned in the introductory chapter of The Rough Guide to Reggae (3rd edition), and it's not in the index. Personally, I can't recall seeing it used anywhere and I've read several books on reggae. Unless someone can dig up a reliable source, it should be removed.
Regarding the rockers part; the source that is used does in fact not state that "in the Caribbean, the heavier forms of reggae are also sometimes known as Rockers music" or anything to that effect IMO. "In rockers, the bass was as heavily amplified as ever and continued to provide the basic background throb—reggae's heartbeat. [...] In some types of heavy reggae (especially in instrumental or "dub" music) the bass takes over the prominent role [...]" (Cut 'n' Mix: Culture, Identity and Caribbean Music p.67). Nothing in that text about "rockers" being a term used in the Caribbean (as in, outside Jamaica), and the heavy part seems to be mostly about dub music. —Gaaarg (talk) 00:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
So, I take it that since you can't find it on Google, therefore you do not believe this is true, and think that someone made it up out of thin air just to confuse you...? Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 01:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
That's not really what I said in my message above... :-) Anyways, see WP:VERIFY: "Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed.". —Gaaarg (talk) 01:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
And this is why wikipedia has the reputation it has, because of armchair experts who delete anything they can't find on google. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 02:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't know why you keep assuming Google is my only source. I gave you another source above, but here's more [1] [2] [3]. I just think it stands to reason that since several books on the subject reggae don't mention the term, it's simply not in common use and hence not notable enough to be mentioned in this article; and I know Google "hit counts" aren't a reliable source, but it can give at least a little indication of if something is used often or not. Have you seen "JAH Throne music" used anywhere? Don't feel like I'm attacking you, I just think the information is false, and shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. —Gaaarg (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Maybe if you had ever spent time in the Caribbean, you wouldn't think this "information is false". But now, thanks to Google, anyone from anywhere in the world can find 400 hits for a phrase and claim to be an expert from their armchair and say therefore it doesn't exist and that somebody made it up. Guess ya gotta love 'em. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 03:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh man. Still there, still in BOLD for some reason. The same logic used to insult armchair experts can be used to infer that just because someone has lived in the Caribbean and heard the term JAH THRONE in reference to reggae from 400 people, doesn't make them an expert on reggae either. Like Gaarg said, there is no attacking just trying to get the most reliable and well known facts together.Is this an edit war? If so this is my first. I don't like the feeling.--Migglesworth (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I've deleted the sentence in question. The use of this "JAH Throne" should not be included, much less in bold (sheesh!), unless specific citation can be given for it. The burden of evidence is on those wanting to include the term, not those asking for it to be removed. This is basic people. You have to prove something exists, not prove its non-existence. I will stand by this edit. --Cziltang Brone (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

One more thing. Rockers music. I understand that it is cited and all that. It is in the wrong place. One recommendation would be to create a section for other names of reggae across the world. That would give a good opportunity to include rockers and many other names like "boom-boom music" and the locations they come from like "Jeret's parents house". Joking aside, seriously, if you want something in there like other names for reggae across the world, create the category and add it to it. Don't just shove it in the second introductory paragraph.--Migglesworth (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Migglesworth on this. The introductory paragraph should be just that -- introductory. It should be of a summary nature for a topic as broad as Reggae. It is not appropriate to include synonyms or culturally/geographically equivalent terms. --Cziltang Brone (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Use of the Disputed tag

I've removed the Accuracy Dispute tag from the article as it is extremely misleading to any outsiders referencing the article, which as a whole has a high degree of accuracy and consensus. The tag should be used when there exist inaccurate statements in the article; not when there is a dispute over omission. The phrase "the factual accuracy of this article is disputed" appearing over, presumably, the omission of a dubious synonym is highly disingenuous. Please discuss the use of the tag here first.--Cziltang Brone (talk) 23:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree. I'm not sure why Gaarg added the tag, nor for that matter, why Spylab moved the sentence about "rockers music" up to the intro. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
just to clarify; when I added the tag, the disputed content was in the article, not omitted. Gaaarg (talk) 01:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I moved the sentence about rockers and Jah Throne Music out of the Etymology section because, by definition, that section is about the origins and history of the word reggae, not about alleged synonyms. It is common to have synonyms of a term in the lead section (if they are backed up by reliable sources) and in bold. Since nobody has come up with references about Jah Throne Music, then it is appropriate to leave it out of the article. As for the suggestion about a separate section about alleged synonyms, I doubt there is enough referenced information to make a section like that.Spylab (talk) 22:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Movement of intro sentence "rockers..."

There is a section in on this page about different forms of reggae and the names they are known by. I think this is a much more appropriate place to put "In the Caribbean, heavier forms of reggae are known as rockers music". If not than stating that "Bass heavy instrumental versions of reggae are known as 'Dub' reggae" would be appropriately placed in the intro too, which it obviously is not. I am going to move the sentence in question to the reggae genres page. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of the subject can elaborate on it there. --Migglesworth (talk) 22:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

So I tried to move it to the Reggae Genres page where there is already a statement on it. Basically all that is needed is to add the sweet citation by Til Eulenspiegel but I don't know how to do it. If one of you more experienced editors can help a brother out, it would be much appreciated.--Migglesworth (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Gaarg--Migglesworth (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Gaarg for what? He did not resolve the problem, he simply tried to blank it out, which is unacceptable as any kind of compromise. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 01:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
I was thanking him/her for doing something I thought would benefit the community, yet was unable to do. This is fast becoming a ridiculous point of contention. Rockers is a genre of reggae marked by heavy use of bass and complicated drumming as stated in the book you have cited. It makes no mention of it being known as rockers mainly in the Caribbean as you have stated. In addition it is quite clear that rockers is a genre of reggae and as with the 13 other genres of reggae, belongs in the reggae genres page. You yourself have stated that you do not know why this disputed statement is even in the intro. Instead of using your time in an effort to have a genre of reggae named in the introductory statement, perhaps use the time to enhance the public understanding of rockers by adding your knowledge to the pre-existing topic of rockers located in the reggae genres page. The citation is great and I feel that it is an adequate compromise by adding it to the rockers section in the reggae genres page. "Run-on sentence advocate since they invented the term" --Migglesworth (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rockers Debate

I look upon this debate with disappointment as it highlights an inherent problem with Wikipedia, people who are not actually familiar with a subject are debating the validity of claims/facts. As someone living in the Caribbean (Trinidad and Tobago), I have heard the "Rockers" term before used in billing. HOWEVER, I do not think it belongs in the introductory paragraph of the article. To establish consensus, approach people familiar with the subject (ie actual people living in the Caribbean) rather than trying to out Google each other. There is the WikiProject Caribbean portal where you can pitch your questions at some persons living in the region. Rasadam (talk) 15:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Well frankly I think we have consensus that "Rockers" is a valid synonym for Reggae, used primarily in the Caribbean. If anyone debates that, please note it here. Also, we seem to have consensus that this factual information does not belong in the intro paragraph. So, let's all try to be constructive and move towards the goal of finding a better place for it in the article. --Cziltang Brone (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
In light of what you said here, I just removed the "dubious" claim on the reference again. There is no explanation of why the reference would be dubious or doubted by anyone. Perhaps the sentence could be moved back where it was, if the objection was that this isn't covered by the section header "Etymology", then just expand the header to "Etymology and nomenclature". Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Well the Caribbean is a big place, Rasadam, and the great majority of whose inhabitants, like where I am, do not speak English. Rockers as a sourced alternative name for reggae does not sound dubious to me. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reggae Culture Section?

Hello, I'm thinking about adding a section on Reggae culture. I have a reference book which deals heavily with that topic, and I think it could be interesting to add some information about the culture that surrounds reggae music to the article. Any opinions on that? The pitfall I see right away might be trying to differentiate reggae culture from Rastafarianism. Is this a worthwhile endeavor? I think our Reggae page is looking pretty good as it is, but I'm still surprised that it's so short considering the size of the topic "Reggae". --Cziltang Brone (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -