Talk:Qom Province
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Copyright examination was requested regarding subject described below. Sadly copyright examinations is not the right place for the request. The most common reason is that the content has already been added/uploaded to Wikipedia. Such cases (violations or not) are taken care of at Wikipedia:Copyright problems.
The request has been moved to List of rejected requests. Please move the request to a better location so it can be taken care of. When the request is moved and/or backed up, please remove this template and the entry from copyright examinations page.
 |
Qom Province is part of WikiProject Iran, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Iran-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
 |
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. |
"History" in this article might be copy vio from [1].
- History content was added at version March 2005 (diff[2])
- Website above exists in Internet Archive of November 2004 [3]
This content is not much the same word-by-word, but is almost the same. Especially, using Islamic Calender, and Hazrat Ma'soomeh "(AS)" is characteristic. -Kotoito 15:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Dates and numbers in this article
Wikipedia policy is clear on the use of Eras in articles:
- Both the BCE/CE era names and the BC/AD era names are acceptable, but be consistent within an article. Normally you should use plain numbers for years in the Common Era, but when events span the start of the Common Era, use AD or CE for the date at the end of the range (note that AD precedes the date and CE follows it). For example, 1 BC–AD 1 or 1 BCE–1 CE.
It is up to the author(s) of an article to determine the dating system to be used and there must be consistency with each article. In this case, for a non-Christian topic in a non-Christian region of the world, BCE/CE appears to make the most sense. Sunray 18:08, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
User: Zereshk, one of the authors of this article has indicated a strong preference for BCE/CE (see Talk: List of kings of Persia. Therefore I am reverting to BCE pending comment from other authors. Sunray 07:03, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
