User talk:Putnam269
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Putnam269, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! xC | ☎ 21:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Hints & tips for song articles
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you've been creating a number of short articles for various hit songs. I just wanted to give you two or three tips that will help make your work more accessible and visible to the rest of Wikipedia.
- Remember to categorize the article. Most importantly, add [[Category:XXX songs]] where XXX is the name of the band or recording artist. You can also add [[Category:YEAR songs]] where YEAR is the release year. The latter may seem a little silly as these categories are typically huge and hard to browse but they are useful for automated bots and for people using the CatScan tool. (For an example of categories added, see for instance what I added to your article Pincushion (song)).
- I see that you're already using {{music-stub}} which is good, although {{song-stub}} is more precise and more useful to others.
- Lastly, you can add to the talk page of the article the following tag: {{songs|class=stub}} which, again, is useful for bot-maintained statistics. (I also did this for Talk:Pincushion (song).)
Thanks for your work here, and let me know if you need any help with all this. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I've gone ahead and fixed a few of your earlier contributions in this way. Of course, adding these categories and tags is good when you create articles but don't hesitate to add these when you find them missing from articles you happen to read! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, please adhere to the suggestions left for you above - you're still creating song articles without adding any categories. Thanks. - eo (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the response. Categories and stubs are easily added... in fact Pascal.Tesson's instructions above are very good, a very basic category add would be to add the year of the single release or group it with the artist, such as "Category:OMD songs" (replacing the quotes with double-brackets). A good thing to do is look at an article for a different OMD song, put the article into edit mode, scroll to the bottom and look at how the categories are formatted. Stub tags can be added easily too, and there are plenty to choose from.
Regarding the speedy-deletion tag below, I don't have anything to do with that, but instructions are shown below about how you can hold off on the deletion process. Thanks. - eo (talk) 18:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Don't Talk To Me About Love
A tag has been placed on Don't Talk To Me About Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 15:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Naked In The Rain
A tag has been placed on Naked In The Rain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Williamwade (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Naked in the rain
Please improve the layout and quality of the article to avoid further confusion.Williamwade (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Umboza
A tag has been placed on Umboza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 18:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Geffery Morgan
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Dustitalk to me 16:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
