Talk:Pullman Square

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pullman Square article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Pullman Square has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 1, 2007 Good article nominee Listed June 16, 2007 Peer review Reviewed Current Status: Good article

	This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale.

	Pullman Square is part of WikiProject KYOVA Region, a project which aims to coordinate work for and expand coverage of the Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia "tri-state" region. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join or engage in discussion.(Usage)
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	Please explain ratings you add or change by editing this article's ratings summary page.

Contents 1 GA comment 2 GA Passed 3 Infobox 4 Peer review comments

[edit] GA comment

Inline citations go directly after the punctuation. Go through the article and fix all occurrences. --Nehrams2020 20:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe all have been taken care of. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Passed

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

[edit] Infobox

There is an infobox that might work well here: Template:Infobox_shopping_mall. Any thoughts? Justen 10:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This isn't a mall with an anchor or many stores. It is considered more of a district than anything. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review comments

Per comment left at the peer view: General editing help would be appreciated, especially in the Construction and opening sub, where it was recently converted from bullet to paragraph format. I will be doing minor edits to see if it can be managed easier, but sometimes a fresh pair of eyes can be better. I believe I have covered the history of the project extensively, and cannot see it being expanded further unless there are new articles (which appear almost weekly it seems). Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)