User talk:Pruthvi.vallabh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you ask me here, I will reply it here

Contents 1 Welcome to Wikiproject India 2 Projects on hand 3 Charans 4 Bafna 5 Welcome messages 6 Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) 7 India related links 8 commons:User:Pruthvi.Vallabh 9 Indian collaboration of the week news 10 Striking your vote 11 Prods 12 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dula Bhaya Kag.jpg 13 Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif - copyright issues 14 Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif - copyright issues 15 Regarding Image of Harilal Upadhyay 16 Assessment Department 17 Mangalore 18 Request for Comment and Expansion of Syngas Fermentation Article 19 Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Bot_Assisted_Assessment 20 Fair use rationale for Image:Ahir woman.jpg

[edit] Welcome to Wikiproject India

[edit] Projects on hand

• user:Pruthvi.vallabh/sachay_mata
• user:Pruthvi.vallabh/charans

[edit] Charans

Hi,

As I said on the comments page, the article very weak in maintaining a neutral point of view. The sentences like "They are highly revered for their unflinching readiness for martyrdom, bravery in war, high literary sense and deep loyalty to patrons." are unacceptable in an encyclopedia. The article is everywhere pro-Charans and a thorough copyedit is needed to make the article neutral. There is also a lot of original research in this article like "Charans respect bravery, loyalty and truth more than life." Also, I am quite certain that Charan mataji.jpg violates copyrights and is not made by Karan gadhavi. Same is true for Karaniji.jpg. In addition to them, there needs to be a dedicated section for history right from the beginning to present times. A section on social and ecomonic condition of Charans today is also required. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks Ambuj, I am presently somewhat busy but will pay attention to your comments pruthvi 19:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Banna, Some fool is reverting rajput page to his version. Please help restore it to the correct version which is: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajput&oldid=102614732

Regards, Kshitij

[edit] Bafna

on the article of Bafna,i say that i writte on Bafna FOR MY web site of Bafnawadi.com and i am the owner of that.so there is no issue of copyright.please see SANJAY BAFNA

Thanks Sanjay to clarify this. Often authors do not automatically hold the copyright of material for their articles. If web-site belongs to you, or you have agreement with web-site about copyright, in that case I would suggest you should write something like this on talk page of article, 'I own copyrights for the material of so and so web-site and giving it on this article under GFDL. pruthvi 16:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome messages

Hi Pruthvi, I generally leave two welcome messages, one is about welcoming to Wikipedia, the other one is about India. I will leave both for you. Let me know if you require any further help. Cheers -- Lost^(talk) 02:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! -- Lost^(talk) 02:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] India related links

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions Contribute content: Collaboration Dashboard - India WikiProject - Wikiportal India - Indian current events - Category adoptions

[edit] commons:User:Pruthvi.Vallabh

I confirm that I am the same user on commons Pruthvi.Vallabh pruthvi 04:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I have voted following images as picture of 2006

Lower Manhattan (72)	Satellite view of crops in USA (121)	The Lion (130)	Ant Anatomy (159)
Aurora Borealis (254)

Follow the link to vote for picture of 2006

[edit] Indian collaboration of the week news

As mentioned in Wikiproject India newsletter of March 2007, the weekly collaboration of the Indian wikiproject has fallen from its once high feats. This message is to request the users to visit the collaboration page and help rejuvenate it.

The present collaboration of the week is Religion in India. Please go through the talk page of the article to see the proposed changes in the article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Striking your vote

Hello Pruthvi.vallabh,

Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.

The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.

The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.

Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.

In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.

We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.

Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at m:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.

Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.

Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling

For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee

[edit] Prods

Please note that proposed deletion is only used for deletions that are not in any way controversial or contested. If someone removes a prod tag, thus contesting it, it is inappropriate to restore the tag. If you think the article should be deleted regardless, please use the articles for deletion process instead. Natalie 14:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dula Bhaya Kag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dula Bhaya Kag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aksi_great (talk) 06:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif - copyright issues

Hi,

I saw that you have marked the image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif

as possible copyright infringement.

I admire the way you are continuously monitoring the stuff to keep wikipedia the most reliable source without violating copyright rules.

Though, as i have mentioned on the image page. That I am the owner of the site harilalupadhyay.org and hence i can claim the image as self created. I am permitting wikipedia to use it under GPL. The comments you can find on the image page as well. I am worried that why the image is not unmarked yet!!!

Please let me know in case I need to provide any further clarification from my side.

-Jiten Upadhyay

[edit] Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif - copyright issues

Hi,

I saw that you have marked the image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Harilalupadhyay.gif

as possible copyright infringement.

I admire the way you are continuously monitoring the stuff to keep wikipedia the most reliable source without violating copyright rules.

Though, as i have mentioned on the image page. That I am the owner of the site harilalupadhyay.org and hence i can claim the image as self created. I am permitting wikipedia to use it under GFDL. The comments you can find on the image page as well. I am worried that why the image is not unmarked yet!!!

Please let me know in case I need to provide any further clarification from my side.

-Jiten Upadhyay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gujaratiauthor (talk • contribs) 16:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for donating an image of Shri Harilal Upadhyay under GFDL, indeed he is a great author and his article should carry a good image of him. I am going to remove the copyright violation tag from his image however I am afraid that will not be useful because once marked as copyright violation there should be a reasonable way to decide on whether edits done in the name of Jiten Upadhayay (copyright holder) are indeed done by Jiten Upadhyay. In brief either your web-site should mention that the said image is available under GFDL or you should send an e-mail to wikipedia from the e-mail address shown on your web-site that you are releasing said image under GFDL. Please follow the instruction at following page Copyright_problems#Copyright_owners_who_submitted_their_own_work_to_Wikipedia

Sorry for inconvenience pruthvi (talk) 19:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Image of Harilal Upadhyay

Hi Pruthvee,

Thanks for the prompt response. Can you provide me the E-Mail address of wikipedia where I need to send the confirmation from my E-Mail address mentioned on the site.

I appreciate your suggestion to have better Image of Late Shri Harilal Upadhyay on the article page. I will try to update with better alternate in near future.

Ok I got it ...

permissions-en at wikimedia dot org

I will send confirmation message here

Regards

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gujaratiauthor (talk • contribs) 00:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment Department

I finally assessed your article - sorry about the delay (of 2 months!!) Unfortunately, it wasn't promoted to a B-class. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any queries or comments about assessment in general, or are replying to the comments here. Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mangalore

Hello..Good assesement on the Mangalore Article. Since, you have assesed the Mangalore article and you have gone through the Mangalore Article, why don't you yourself assess the article at Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Places. GA status requires more detailed review but doesn't always require a very experienced reviewer. Any editor who has not contributed significantally to the Article can take it up. Your minor contribution will help WikiProject India and it will be even your first professional assesement on Wikipedia. Remember, the guidelines for GA is not as stringent as that for a FA.

A good article should just have the following attributes:

1. It is well written. In this respect:

(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it: (a) provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout; (b) at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons; and (c) contains no original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it: (a) addresses the major aspects of the topic; and (b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).

4. It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. 5. It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. 6. It is illustrated, where possible and appropriate, by images. In this respect:

(a) images used are tagged with their copyright status, and fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) the images are appropriate to the topic, and have suitable captions.-->>>>>>Kensplanet (talk) 12:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for inviting to assess Mangalore articles for good article category. Tomorrow onward I am going on vacation and wouldn't be accessing internet. I would be able to do it only after returning from vacation. Meanwhile if someone else does the assessment then good else I will do it. pruthvi (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Comment and Expansion of Syngas Fermentation Article

Hi Pruthvi.vallabh,

I need your comment, and help for the expansion of the article if you can. I have been trying to finish the Syngas Fermentation which is a part of Wikiproject Energy Development. Could you please look at the article, and do your best?

Thanks

Ferit Isik 15:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Bot_Assisted_Assessment

FYI. Inviting Thoughts -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 05:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ahir woman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ahir woman.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't know why this image shows me as uploader. I haven't uploaded it. Only edit I made was to mention that this image may be violating personality right. If it is violating copyrights please delete it. pruthvi (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)