Talk:Porn creep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Porn creep article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

HAHAH fems aren't psychologists,...where the hell is a case listed for the paraphilia you listed? Radical Feminists need to get some therapy for their sexual shame —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.202.97.53 (talk • contribs) .

[edit] References

Although I'm not paticularly keen on this topic it does cite a few of is references. Then again if it were my decision I would delete it completely for its pointlessness. 194.81.176.254 11:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't think this is a relevant topic, and even what is included in the article is flatly wrong. Naomi Wolf was never active in the feminist movement in the 1970s. She first came to public attention in 1991 with the publication of the Beauty Myth. Recommend deletion of this article.--Tom Joudrey 18:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability?

Is there any notability to this? It seems rather pointless to me...

I move to delete. -- TheSlyFox 11:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paradox

"where despite the legality and wide availability of pornographic material, public interest in, and consumption of, pornography has dropped since the 1970s. "

Of course the demand would fall if it is feely available and unchecked. We need to draw a line as to what is acceptable and what is not. Unfortunately websites like Wikipedia are victim to pornographers