Talk:Pondus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (general): Comic strips work group Related work groups (nations and regions): European comics work group

[edit] Snip

From the article:

Just recently we got the unbelivebly news that Jokke and Camilla are expecting a baby (congratulations).

May I remind you that they are fictional characters? — JIP | Talk 15:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

That's taken out of the article now anyway Sam Vimes 15:41, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

They are fictional characters, yes. But does it really matter if it says congrats anyway? It can`t possibly hurt anyone (least of all Jokke and Camilla as they are fictional characters only). But I won`t put it back in the article as I have no problem with it not being there, I just wonder why anoyone can have a problem whith it being there...It doesn`t matter, your choise.

It's not something you'd find in an encyclopedia, though - it's a matter of style, really. Sam Vimes 14:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Understood!

[edit] Roger

I am sorely disappointed to not find a single mention of Roger! --Majushi

I put in a bit on him. MURGH ^disc. 03:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)