User talk:Pn57
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:TBLeague.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TBLeague.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WaterPolo
Dear Pn57,
I am trying to start a WaterSports Wikiproject. I got this idea when I noticed that the Phelps page did not have a picture, even when it was a featured article on the main page, and when he broke the world record. Swimming/WaterSports needs a hub of workers to help with swimming related articles. The project would include long and short course, along with water ballet, syncro, diving, water polo, open water and the players of those sports. It might be given the name WaterSport(s). Its all up for discussion. If you are interested in helping out, please add your name to this list and add any comments you might have. See you around the pool, --wpktsfs 03:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User bandy
A tag has been placed on Template:User bandy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Scientists of Modern Music
I restored the notability tag that you removed from The Scientists of Modern Music. It's not smart to remove a valid tag, when you don't fully understand Wikipedia policies. If you remove it again without first adding references to verify the band's notability, I will propose deletion of the article on the grounds of non-notability. If you dispute the proposed deletion, then I will nominate it under the WP:AFD process where other editors will examine the article and very likely conclude that the band lacks notability and will therefore delete it. You have three choices: 1) find reliable sources to verify the band's notability; 2) leave the tag alone and perhaps months will go by before someone decides to delete the article; 3) remove the tag and escalate to an AFD deletion within two weeks. Sbowers3 (talk) 16:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for responding. Let's start by looking at the notability guideline. Here are some of its criteria:
- Has had a charted hit on any national music chart.
- Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
- Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
- Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.
- Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury or Grammis award.
- From the article I don't see that any of the above apply. So the best chance is this criterion:
- It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
- This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries except for ...
- It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
- Now let's look at your references:
- the Falls Festival is merely a mention that the band was on the schedule.
- the Triple J reference looks okay but even it might not be totally independent and reliable.
- sanity.com is just a catalog entry
- So perhaps you see why I say that the band's notability is questionable. Your best bet is to find newspaper or magazine articles about them - and add those references to the article. Or read WP:music to see if some other criterion will demonstrate notability.
- Even though notability is marginal, the article is written and formatted better than many. I'm not (for now) proposing it be deleted. But someone else may see a complete lack of notability and propose deletion. On the other hand, some other editor might come along and try to find references to establish notability. Sbowers3 (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from CHERUB. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Also, your addition of the semi-protection template on this article does not make sense, because the page is not protected and can only be protected by an administrator. — scetoaux (T/C) 06:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Sparkadia
A tag has been placed on Sparkadia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drivenapart (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
