Talk:Picornavirus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Viruses WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and organize articles about biological viruses on Wikipedia. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Mid | This article is has been assigned a Mid-importance to the Viruses WikiProject. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
Below are comments from Talk:Picornaviridae
[edit] Is it acceptable to blank out Talk pages in Wikipedia?
I doubt it. So,
I restore below what 88.105.13.157 and 212.76.37.146 deleted. 198.49.180.40 22:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] How is this word pronounced?
Does one say "pico-R-N-A-virus", or, "picor-na-virus"? 198.49.180.40 20:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merger
Both articles start out Picornaviruses are viruses that belong to the family Picornaviridae. This seems to indicate that they maybe two different names for the same thing. Maybe we should merge redirect... Both articles are about the same family of virusus. Bdelisle 20:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Agree with merge redirect - the two articles provide similar info. A model example is at Retroviridae, which redirects to Retrovirus. This could be handled the same way. The resulting article should be at Picornavirus. -- (James McNally) (talkpage) 20:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- This article should focus on biological and general clinical behavior of picornavirus. The information on poliovirus, rhinovirus and the others should be limited to their own pages. I also agree with merging this article with picornaviruses (i.e. since theres not much difference between "the simpsons" and "simpson family", anyway) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.38.17.150 (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
-
-
- Agree, merge articles, both would clearly benefit from such a merger. I could 4 yeahs and 0 nays, if there are no other comments in the next few days I will complete the merge myself.--DO11.10 21:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Agree. They are one and the same.GiollaUidir 19:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
End Talk:Picornaviridae comments
