Talk:Pentachaeta bellidiflora
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Pentachaeta bellidiflora has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | |||
 |
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on November 23, 2006. | |||
|
||||
 |
Pentachaeta bellidiflora is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Captivity?
Is there any way to purchase seeds or plants and keep them as a houseplant? Maybe this way, we could bring the population back up and introduce it back into other wild areas. I really do not know too much about botany, so this is why I'm asking the Wikipedians. Thanks!
[edit] assessment
importance stems from endemic to a narrow range entirely within california and the fact that the plant is endangered, possibly critically. Anlace 02:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] To do list
Article needs some work to reach GA, although it is close now.
- NPOV: ok
- Images: ok
- Breadth: ok
- Usability: ok
- Sources: ok
- Compelling prose:
- "occurs" is used twice in the intro.
- some terms too technical such as fusiform, need definition or link
- should use italics for document names (see end of article)
- needs a few more routine links and dabs (df "membranous) Architectsf 05:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- all the above items have been addressed today. Anlace 03:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Changes all seem to be responsive and the article currently meets GA criteria. Pass. Architectsf 15:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
-
