Talk:Paramara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
 |
This article is maintained by the Indian history workgroup. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
Contents |
[edit] Descendants of the Parmar dynasty in Maharashtra.
The royal family of Phaltan, (located in present day Maharashtra), also trace their decent from the Parmar dynasty. The family which settled in Maharashtra in the 12th century has the probable distinction as being the oldest dynasty in Maharashtra. The current surname of the memebers of this family is Naik Nimbalkar. I do not know why but nobody except professional historians even know about that this family was originally part of the Parmar dynasty. The Naik Nimbalkar family is very intimately related to Chatrapati Shivaji, as both his maternal and paternal grandmothers were from this family as well as his daughter was married to a Naik Nimbalkar. The last Adhipati (King) of Phaltan was a very popular ruler and played a prominent part in the post-independence politics of Maharashtra. The current head of the family is also very socially active.
I would welcome any comments/contradictions about this information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.47.166.113 (talk) 19:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Get involved in digging out references.
Those of you located in maharashtra are requested to post web-material or photostate copies of material cited in [[1]][[2]]on Thakur Sher Singh Parmar:
The Citations
Gallant Acts-
1. The Article titled "Custom inspector wa shipai yaa doghaani 40-50 taskar palwoon lawley" in Nav Konkan, marathi daily,registration number REGD NO. RTG-15/34, issue number 141, dated first of February, 2005, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
2. Sagar, marathi daily, dated 7th of April, 2005, Ciplun, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
3. DRI-2 Report on Anjarla-Sawani Silver Seizure Case issued vide letter f.no.VIII(CUS)10-1/91/123 dated 3rd of February 1991 by the Superintendent of Customs, Dapoli, Pune Commissionerate.
His role in Sawani-Anjarla Silver Seizure Case- 1. The Article titled "Custom inspector wa shipai yaa doghaani 40-50 taskar palwoon lawley" in Nav Konkan, marathi daily,registration number REGD NO. RTG-15/34, issue number 141, dated the first of February, 2005, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
2. Sagar, marathi daily, dated 7th of April, 2005, Ciplun, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
3. DRI-2 Report on Anjarla-Sawani Silver Seizure Case issued vide letter f.no.VIII(CUS)10-1/91/123 dated 3rd of February 1991 by the Superintendent of Customs, Dapoli, Pune Commissionerate.
4. Certificate dated 4th of November, 1996 issued by S.N.Parwal, the Assistant Commisioner of Customs Division, Dapoli.This certificate says:"...Shri Sher Singh Parmar then Inspector of Customs Harnai Port...booked a seizure case of smuggled silver worth Rs. 2.50 Crores ( Approx. ) displaying exemplary bravery, resourcefulness and boldness on 30-1-1991 at Anjarla - Sawani (Taluka Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri) a remote western Indian Sea-Shore."
5. Confidential Note dated 15th of October,1999 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Pune-IV Division, Pune.
6. Letter f.no.III/Presidential Award/98/Pune dated 12th of November,1999 written to the Chief Commissioner, Pune Customs by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Pune-I Commissionerate, Pune.
Bankot Creek Saved from RDX landings- 1. Confidential Note dated 15th of October,1999 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Pune-IV Division, Pune.
2. Letter f.no.III/Presidential Award/98/Pune dated 12th of November,1999 written to Chief Commissioner, Customs, Pune by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Pune-I Commissionerate, Pune.
Honest and Simple Life- 1. Confidential Note dated 15th of October,1999 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Pune-IV Division, Pune.
2. Letter f.no.III/Presidential Award/98/Pune dated 12th of November,1999 written to the Chief Commissioner, Pune Customs by issued by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Pune-I Commissionerate, Pune.
3. Diwas-Ratri, Hindi daily, dated 22nd of May, 2000, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
4. Navbharat, Hindi daily, dated 26th of March, 2000, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Literary Contributions and Dr. Manibhai Desai Rashtraseva Puraskar- 1. Diwas-Ratri, Hindi daily, dated 22nd of May, 2000, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
2. Navbharat, Hindi daily, dated 26th of March, 2000, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
3. Diwas-Ratri, Hindi daily, dated 26th of March, 2000, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
4. Diwas-Ratri, Hindi daily, dated 19th of July, 1999, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Also , do same for TEJASWANI UDAY PAWAR & Ramesh Pawar
Kushwah 12:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikification and clean-up
Wikification (and clean-up) of this article has been completed. During this, a lot of information was removed that was either written in unencyclopedic prose or that was relevant to another article. The former, related to "Modern history", is retained as an editor's comment, and can be reintroduced with proper copy-editing and balancing for NPOV. The latter, related to the Ponwar article, has been removed from this article entirely. Links and references relating to Sharad Pawar have also been removed, although I'm not sure whether or not he deserves a mention in this article.
Also, in this article, "Paramara" and "Ponwar" are treated as two different clans of possibly similar descent. This is primarily based on the information in the latter article, but I would appreciate some clarification on the exact differences between the two names. Cheers. – Liveste 05:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Social Status - wrong information..
Low cast Parmaras - the origin can be observed in that the teaching of the learned Parmara kings. When we can see the Masjid erected in period of the King 'Udayaditya'. I have this opinion that when sufis came to Dhar region they might have created impact of equal social status by preaching the Koran. As king himself admired the Dharma, this is quite possible that some of the social elements might have turned to the new dharma teachings and may be converted to Muslim.
Another point is that the Paramara controlled area people might have started some movement in which when they are asked who you are - answer might have been - from Paramara region; finally coming to claim that from Paramara lordship. Result claiming - Paramara clan membership. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.80.57.2 (talk) 01:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
