Talk:Our Love to Admire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
The album is still untitled, is it not? If you are going to change the title to Mammoth, please cite your sources.
Contents |
[edit] Release date of June 4th/5th not confirmed by band
However, their front page of their official site says 07.10.07 - pretty much confirmation from the band that July 10 is the album's release date.
- Slagkick
[edit] Magic Shop Studios
It's in New York, not SF. http://www.magicshopny.com/
Slagkick 12:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pitchfork Review
The review by Pitchfork of Our Love to Admire doesn't appear in the professional reviews column, despite Pitchfork reviews usually appearing on wikipedia articles of albums. I would put it in myself but I'm afraid I don't know how to. 220.253.166.240 12:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- I added it for you. In the future, you can just try yourself (in this case e.g. by copying a previous review in the source of the article and changing the details), that's why we have a "preview" button. You can try and change it and with using "preview" you will not change the article itself until you figured out, how it should be done. =) --SoWhy Talk 12:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] All Music Guide Review
- Obviously some fanatical Interpol fans were in denial about the be all and end all of reviews, so I added it in there to remind them of how crap their beloved band is. Cheers, - ZEROpumpkins 07:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC) - :Do we need to understand this? You added a 3/5 AMG-review just to annoy people who are not annoyed by much worse reviews like PopMatters' 4/10? --SoWhy Talk 19:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC) - ::Yes you do. All Music Guide is the be all and end all of reviews... Oh yeah, and Interpol just plain suck - ZEROpumpkins 08:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC) - :::That might be both your personal viewpoint, which might be wrong or right, I don't care. AMG has it's right to be listed there, because it is a notable review site, not because it is "better" or "more important" than other such pages. On the other hand, I would advise to be less childish in your reasons of editing things. It does not reflect very well on yourself to go around and claim things you don't like "suck". That's behavior you'd expect from 11-year-olds (of course, I cannot rule out the possibility that this is indeed your age). --SoWhy Talk 12:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC) - ::::No, Interpol just suck. They really, really do. I have the scientific evidence too. - ZEROpumpkins 08:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] the 'Pioneer to the Falls' instrumental
I need to know, from the band's viewpoint, the thinking and origin behind that song. I'll also need a web-reference or two please, thank you.--MurderWatcher1 19:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
