Category talk:Orphaned fairuse images
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Vandalism
Regarding the admonition: Also check for possible vandalism - it is not unknown for vandals to have blanked pages with image references I have a question. Whilst this caution sounds quite reasonable, how does one ensure that this isn't indeed the case? Rklawton 04:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tough question. If you were really suspicious about something, you could always go to the article where you think it should be (e.g. it should be pretty easy to tell, especially for albums, software, movies, etc.)... enochlau (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category name
Can we have this renamed so that "fairuse" -> "fair use"? enochlau (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's OK with me. Will this break anything? Rklawton 14:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure - that's why I'm asking here to see if anyone can come up with any problems. Firstly, Special:Whatlinkshere/Category:Orphaned_fairuse_images has quite a bit, but nothing a bot or a script can't do (or manual labour). I'm just worried about breaking bots - is there a bot that does this stuff? enochlau (talk) 15:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
