Talk:Order of battle at the Glorious First of June

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Order of battle at the Glorious First of June article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Order of battle at the Glorious First of June is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
	Order of battle at the Glorious First of June is part of the "Atlantic campaign of May 1794" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
List milestones Date Process Result January 25, 2008 Featured list candidate Promoted March 1, 2008 Featured topic candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured list

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force French military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792–1815)

Contents 1 Mont-Blanc or not Mont-Blanc ? 2 Rainiers attached squadron 3 28 May Error 4 29 May Error 5 Frigates

[edit] Mont-Blanc or not Mont-Blanc ?

After the matter was raised on my talk page [1], I have a few elements:

• according to my sources (Dictionnaire des bâtiments de la flotte de guerre française de Colbert à nos jours, [2]), no ship of the French Navy was named Mont Blanc on 1 July 1794.
• the ship Mont-Blanc was indeed present, but as Trente-et-un Mai
• a 74-gun Mont-Blanc was reported with Indomptable in tow. The ship which did take Indomptable in tow was the 42-gun frigate Brutus, a razee 74-gun.

That's what I have for now. These elements would suggest to me that someone mistook the Brutus for a 74-gun ship of the line (which she used to be, so in the smoke and excitement...). Furthermore, French ships were renamed everytime political trends changed in Paris, so quite often; I assume that keeping informed of this would be problematic over the Channel. The problem is that this is OR-ish, so I don't know what to do with it. If someone has an idea, do let me know. Cheers ! Rama (talk) 20:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

For keeping track of changing names, Alain Demerliac's Nomenclature des navires français 1792-1799 is a great book. --Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rainiers attached squadron

Seems to be missing a few names :)

[edit] 28 May Error

The Audacieux did not take part in the fight. It was actually part of Nielly's squadron that hadn't yet linked up with Villaret's fleet. When Nielly stumbled across the disabled Révolutionaire, he sent the Audacieux to take her under tow. Both ships eventually reached Rochefort safely. --Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 29 May Error

Rama is right about the Mont-Blanc being the Trente-et-un Mai, the name should be changed. It did not take the Indomptable in tow. I don't have archival material at hand, so I'm not sure if the Brutus too it in tow, but it was rase ship, so it only had 50 guns and was more like a heavy frigate than a ship of the line.--Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Frigates

Due to the turbulent situation exisiting in France during 1794, accurate records regarding which frigates were with which fleet and which were present at which action do not exsist. Thus only an incomplete listing of French support craft can be created, based mainly on those recognised and reported by British officers That is BS. The sources exist,British authors are just too lazy to address French sources. I'll come back and fix this up a bit for the French side when I get a chance.--Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)