Talk:One Worldwide Plaza

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale.

	Architecture Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. To participate, visit the project page for more information.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

---

Wikipedia as the Real Estate Section. No attempt at creating encyclopedic context: a raw advertisement --Wetman 21:34, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think the previous comment is a bit outdated now. However, I think we should just call this "Worldwide Plaza" and mention the three main buildings. It was built at the same time and it's effectively one big unit dm 05:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Multiple pictures?

I'm not sure why we have multiple pictures of essentially the same thing (eg: two of the towers, then two of the fountain) dm 04:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, I took two new pictures because I didn't like someone else's old ones. Now, don't peek at the record, but of each pair, which do you like better? We should get rid of one of each, if others do not object, and I'll try not to object on the basis of pride if mine get the black ball. Jim.henderson 04:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Well I dont care either, even though they were mine :) Tell you what, let's let the next person pick which two to keep. dm 07:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

So, interest does not seem intense except among us shutterbugs. I only took up photography {with a broken camera} a few weeks ago and this was one of my first subjects. This month or next I hope to gain access to a roof that looks down on the #3 building, though maybe not down into the plaza. If any of my pictures come out well, then we'll have five or maybe even six. At that point the article will definitely be photo-heavy and we can move the majority to a Gallery or out of the article entirely. In springtime I'll buy a camera that's not broken and maybe get on the roof for shots with a western rather than southern sun. Meanwhile the article is only modestly heavy with photos, and I figure we can keep them until more arrive or other editors think trimming is already a good idea. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)