Talk:NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc. has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on July 17, 2007.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 19, 2007 Good article nominee Listed September 20, 2007 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject Organized Labour, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Organized Labour. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Organized Labour Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for February 17.
	If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.

[edit] GA Review

I am going to pass this article as Good Article. It clearly explains the events leading up to and following the NLRB ruling. There is still a lot of work until FA though. More references are needed, perhaps some cases relying on this ruling. Dagomar 00:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

My review is complete.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Just a tiny problem. "As a result the changing decisions of the NLRB over time, while workers who are not union members do not currently have the right to the presence of a representative during management inquiries, it is unclear whether that will be true in the future." What is the word "currently" mean? Give a date or year. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA review — kept

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,Ruslik 07:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)