User talk:Nickmanning214
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] May 2006
Thank you for experimenting with Love. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --→Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!..
..
19:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Language
Stop adding those 3 language games to the List of languages article. It's not supposed to be a fun list. Please inform yourself first a) what a language is and b) what this article wants to include (it says it does not list constructed langauges; Esperanto is a special case, though). Pig Latin, Ubbi Dubbi and Opish are not languages, they are merely modifications that one could apply to nearly any language, they don't have any phonology, syntax or vocabulary, as all natural (and even artificial) langauges do. So please leave them out, they do not belong into the list. — N-true 03:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wenis repost
Do not repost material that has previously been deleted, it is considered vandalism. Thank you. --Charles 19:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inward singing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Inward singing article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Kimchi.sg 09:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits to Milwaukee Brewers
I am not sure if "The Brewers is a team" is correct grammar in American English when reliable news sources print the otherwise:
- "The Brewers are a team on the rise" [1]
- "the Cardinals are a team without [2]
- "The Heat are a team that can do either" [3]
- "The Yankees are a team that builds runs" [4]
- "The Red Sox are a team that connects generations" [5]
- "Chicago reliever Mike Sirotka believes the White Sox are a team that can make a comeback" [6]
- "The Giants are a team in flux" [7]
- "The Redskins are a team that won all the close games in September" [8]
Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Here are some more specific examples:
- "the Milwaukee Brewers are a team 'picked to click' this season" [9]
- "Ultimately, it comes down to if the Boston Red Sox are a better team with Wily Mo Pena" [10]
- " Still, the strongest proof yet that the Dallas Cowboys are a completely new team under coach Bill Parcells lies in beating the Philadelphia Eagles and how they did it" [11]
- "The Miami Heat are a different team from when they lost to the Dallas Mavericks in February" [12]
- "The Minnesota Vikings are a hard team to take seriously" [13]
- "That's why it doesn't seem to be such a leap in logic for me to say that the Minnesota Vikings are a team of destiny this year." [14]
- "The Los Angeles Lakers are a very dangerous team to have to play in the first round of the Western Conference playoffs" [15]
[edit] AfD Nomination: List of physics formulae
I've nominated the article List of physics formulae for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that List of physics formulae satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of physics formulae. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of List of physics formulae during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. DMacks 03:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of physics formulae
I hope you don't mind my changes. I think this article is important, and I want it to be kept, so I'm making changes liberally. Thanks. --N Shar 04:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 04:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Recreation of The Largest Facebook Group Ever
A tag has been placed on The Largest Facebook Group Ever, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how The Largest Facebook Group Ever is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:The Largest Facebook Group Ever saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. —C.Fred (talk) 21:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Collegefuckfest.com
A tag has been placed on Collegefuckfest.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 04:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Annie akhtar
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Annie akhtar, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
