Mock trial
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page. (Discuss) |
 |
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Moot court. (Discuss) |
A mock trial is a contrived or imitation trial. It is similar to moot court, but mock trials deal with trials, while moot court deals with appellate court. Attorneys preparing for a real trial might use a mock trial consisting of volunteers to test theories or experiment with each other. In a mock trial the rules are often abbreviated in order to focus on particular parts of the trial.
Mock trial is also the name of an extracurricular program in which students participate in contrived or fake trials to learn new skills and compete with each other. At some law schools, the term trial advocacy is used for the program. Various organizations such as state bar associations sponsor mock trial/trial advocacy competitions for middle school students, high school students, college students, and law students.
Interscholastic mock trials takes place on three levels. High school competitive mock trial has an annual national competition governed by the National Mock Trial Association. The competition on the college circuit is governed by the American Mock Trial Association. The college circuit also has an unofficial online forum at Perjuries Mock Trial. Finally, there is mock trial/trial advocacy at the Law School level such as the National Trial Competition hosted by the Texas Young Lawyers Association.
Contents |
[edit] Competition framework
Trial information is sent out in summer to early fall (depending on the level) to each of the competing teams. This information consists of the charges and basis of the case, rules that must be followed, and affidavits of each of the testifying or potentially testifying witnesses.[1] Additional information including documents, maps, and diagrams are often included to help teams understand the situation of the case. These can often be introduced at trial as exhibits.
Teams have to study and analyze this information and form their case by the time of competition, typically held in winter to early spring.[2] Each state has its own case every year that is different than the national case. This means that the winners of the state competitions, who move on to nationals, must study and prepare a completely different case in time for the National High School Mock Trial Competition in May.[3]
The teams consist of a maximum of eight official members.[4] These eight members must be organized into two teams of six for the prosecution/plaintiff and defense sides. Both of these six-member sub teams consist of three attorneys and three witnesses.[5]
[edit] Trial Procedure
The trial begins with the judge coming in. The judge then gives out the instructions to the jury (about what they need to listen to). The judge then lets the prosecution/plaintiff give an opening statement followed by the opening statement of the defense. After the opening statements, examination of the witnesses begins. The prosecution/plaintiff calls up their witnesses first. An attorney for the prosecution/plaintiff does a direct examination of the witness. Once the direct examination is complete, the opposing team may cross-examine the witness. After the cross-examination, if the first team chooses, they may redirect the witness and, likewise, the other team may do a re-cross after this. This process is repeated for the two remaining plaintiff witnesses. Once the prosecution/plaintiff has finished with their witnesses, the process is repeated with the defense witnesses, having the defense attorneys direct and the plaintiff attorneys cross-examine.[5]
Once all of the witnesses have been examined, the trial moves to closing arguments. The plaintiff again goes first. After the defense finishes their closing argument, the plaintiff may give a rebuttal argument if they still have time remaining. In some competitions, the rebuttal is limited to the scope of the defense’s closing argument.[5] Time limits are set at each level of competition to prevent the trials from running too long and to keep rounds of competition running smoothly.
[edit] Judging
There are several different ways that a mock trial can be judged. In one, the judges for scoring the mock trial consist of the presiding judge and two scoring judges, all of whom score the teams. In a second method, there are two scoring judges and the presiding judge, as in the first method, but the presiding judge does not score the teams, rather he simply votes or casts a ballot for one team or another.[5] In yet another method of judging, there are three scoring judges and the presiding judge is not involved in the scoring of the teams.
The winning team is not necessarily the team that won the verdict in the traditional sense. Instead evaluators score individual attorneys and witnesses on a 1-10 scale based on each stage of the trial. These consist of the opening statements for the plaintiff and defense, each of the witnesses’ testimony, direct and cross-examination by attorneys, and the closing statements for both sides. The team with the highest total number of points is often, but not always, the team that wins the judge's verdict. So, it is possible for the defendant to be found guilty or lose the case but for the defense team to still win the round.
Points can be deducted from a team’s score for testifying with information outside the scope of the mock trial materials and for unsportsmanlike conduct or abuse of objections.[6]
[edit] Power Matching
In the first round of the tournament, all of the teams are randomly matched to compete with each other. After the first round of some tournaments, teams are “power matched” to go up against other teams with similar records (i.e. in the second round, a 1-0 team will be matched with another 1-0 team).[5] If there is a tie in record, the judges will use the number of ballots and total points earned to decide the matching.[5] This allows for teams to compete with other teams of similar skill. In later rounds, the power matching forces the first and second place teams to compete against each other, making it easier to determine a winner of the overall competition.
[edit] Specific levels of competition
Large-scale competition exists at the high school, undergraduate, and law school levels.
[edit] High school mock trial
The National High School Mock Trial Championship was begun in 1984.[5] This first competition consisted of teams from Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Wisconsin. [5] The competition since has grown and now is considered to be an “All-State” tournament. Each year, various participating states around the country take turns hosting the tournament. The state of Delaware won its bid to host the 2008 National Championship in Wilmington. The tournament took place from May 8-11. The 2009 Championship will be held in Atlanta, Georgia. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania will host in 2010. New York State does not participate in the national competition, rather it has its own intrastate competition consisting of over 350 teams throughout the state. It follows similar rules to that of the national competition. New York has three levels of play, county competition, regional competition, and the finals, which is held in Albany, New York in May. The state of Maryland also does not compete in the National High School tournament, and thus has their own statewide mock trial competition similar to that of New York. [7]
The mock trial program was started to allow high school students to experience the courtroom in a hands-on role. The mock trials are set up and structured just like a “real” court, bound by the same rules. [8] This can help the students to know exactly what role each of the different people in a court (judges, lawyers, witnesses, etc.) do in the judicial system.
The following is the list of winners of the National High School Mock Trial Championships (since 2000), as well as the runners-ups:
| Year | Winner | 1st Runner-Up | 2nd Runner-Up | 3rd Runner-Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Jonesboro High School (Georgia) | Kalamazoo Central High School (Michigan) | The Charter School of Wilmington (Delaware) | Sandia High School (New Mexico) |
| 2007 | Jonesboro High School (Georgia) | Kalamazoo Central High School (Michigan) | John Adams High School (Indiana) | Saint Louis Priory School (Missouri) |
| 2006 | Valley High School (Iowa) | Kalamazoo Central High School (Michigan) | Timothy Christian High School (Illinois) | Greensburg Salem High School (Pennsylvania) |
| 2005 | Tamalpais High School (California) | Kauai High School (Hawaii) | University High School (Arizona) | Minneapolis South High School (Minnesota) |
| 2004 | Bob Jones Academy (South Carolina) | Rhinelander High School (Wisconsin) | Meadow Creek Christian School (Minnesota) | Community High School (Michigan) |
| 2003 | FCA Homeschoolers (Tennessee) | Glenwood Springs High School (Colorado) | John Adams High School (South Bend, Indiana) (Indiana) | Riverside Polytechnic High School (California) |
| 2002 | FCA Homeschoolers (Tennessee) | Quigley Catholic High School (Pennsylvania) | Glenwood Springs High School (Colorado) | Abraham Lincoln High School (California) |
| 2001 | Pocahontas High School (Iowa) | Montclair High School (New Jersey) | Franklin High School (Washington) | Mountain Ridge High School (Arizona) |
| 2000 | Franklin High School (Washington) | Asheboro High School (North Carolina) | Kalamazoo Central High School (Michigan) | Bergen Catholic High School (New Jersey) |
During the 2005 National High School Mock Trial Championship, issues were raised regarding participation of the New Jersey state champion on the Jewish Sabbath. The American Mock Trial Invitational was created in 2006 by the New Jersey State Bar Foundation and the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers as an alternative competition to address concerns of religious commitments by competing school teams.[9][10]
[edit] College mock trial
On the inter-collegiate circuit, a mock trial team consists of three attorneys and three witnesses on each side of the case (plaintiff/prosecution and defense). The attorneys are responsible for delivering an opening statement, conducting direct and cross examinations of witnesses and delivering closing arguments. Witnesses are selected in a sports draft format from a pool of approximately eight to 10 available witnesses prior to the round. Typical draft orders are PDPDPD or PPDDPD. Judges are usually attorneys or coaches, and in some occasions, practicing judges. A tournament consists of four rounds, two on each side of the case, scored by two judges in each round.
[edit] Tournament Competition
The season runs in two parts, the invitational season and the regular season. Invitational tournaments are held throughout the fall semester and into early spring across the country. Based upon independent rankings of all invitational tournaments, as of December 10, 2007, the top four Invitationals in the Country, in terms of field strength: 1. The Great American Mock Trial Invitational – University of Virginia 2. The Big Apple Invitational Tournament – Columbia University 3. The Marcus D. Pohlmann Invitational – Cornell College 4. The Steel City Invitational – University of Pittsburgh
The regular season begins in late January, starting with regional tournaments. Regionals are held across the country in various locations as qualifiers for the National Championship Tournament. Teams at each school may earn up to two bids to either the National Championship Tournament (gold flight) or a National Tournament (silver flight). The two National Tournaments, held in March, consist of 48 teams each, with the top 6 teams at each National earning a second-chance bid to the National Championship Tournament, held in April. For 22 years, the National Championship Tournament was held in Des Moines, Iowa, the city in which collegiate mock trial began. In 2007, the National Championship Tournament was held in St. Petersburg, Florida. The 2008 National Championship Tournament will be held in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
[edit] Past Championship Results
On April 9, 2006, the University of Virginia beat Harvard University to win the National Championship.[11] In what was the closest final round in AMTA history, the University of Virginia won the championship by a single point using a tiebreaker, after a three judge panel split with one judge choosing Virginia as the winner, one choosing Harvard, and one calling the round a draw. The University of Virginia's victory ended the recent run by UCLA, who had won the two previous national championships.
On April 15, 2007, the University of Virginia again beat Harvard University to win the National Championship. This marked the first ever re-match of a previous year's final round. Virginia again won via a split decision, winning two of the three ballots in the final round. Virginia also became the 4th program to ever repeat as champions, joining UCLA, the University of Iowa, and Rhodes College, who accomplished this feat twice. Harvard University became the second program to be the runner up in consecutive years, joining University of Maryland, College Park as the only other program to accomplish this feat. Maryland however, had the distinction of losing to themselves in one of their two defeats.
On April 6, 2008, the University of Maryland prevailed over George Washington University in a split ballot decision (2-1). This was the University of Maryland's fifth National Championship giving them more total wins than any other university-previously the University of Maryland was tied with Rhodes, each school winning four titles.
The following is the list of winners of the National Championship Tournament, as well as the runners-up:
- Note that following 1992, the "Maryland Rule" was instituted, which places both teams from the same school in the same division in order to ensure there will never be another championship round between two teams from the same school.
National Championship Round Participants
[edit] Law school mock trial
In interscholastic mock trial/trial advocacy at a law school level, teams typically consist of several "attorneys" and several "witnesses" on each side. Every team in a tournament is given the same "problem" or "case" several months in advance, and they prepare to try the case from either side. The cases are carefully written in an attempt to create an equal chance of either side prevailing, since the main objective is not to identify the winner of the case, but rather the team with superior advocacy skills. Occasionally the winners of mock trial tournaments receive special awards such as money or invitations to special events, but the status of winning a tournament is significant in and of itself.
[edit] Other mock trials
Practicing litigators may use mock trials to assist with trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Unlike scholastic mock trials, these mock trials can take numerous forms depending on the information sought. For example, when faced with complex fact issues in a particular case, attorneys might convene a mini mock trial to try different methods of presenting their evidence, sometimes before a mock jury.
[edit] References
- ^ http://www.crf-usa.org/law_government/mock_trial.html Mock Trial CRF
- ^ http://www.nysba.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Public_Resources/Law,_Youth_and_Citizenship/Mock_Trial_Tournament/Mock_Trial_Tournament.htm NYSBA Mock Trial
- ^ Law-related Education: Mock Trial main
- ^ http://www.flrea.org/programs/mock_trial.html FLREA Mock Trial
- ^ a b c d e f g h National High School Mock Trial Championship
- ^ Tennessee State High School Mock Trial Competition
- ^ http://www.nysba.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Public_Resources/Law,_Youth_and_Citizenship/Mock_Trial_Tournament/Mock_Trial_Tournament.htm
- ^ http://www.legalexplorer.com/education/education-mock.asp Mock Trial Education
- ^ American Mock Trial Invitational, accessed April 19, 2007.
- ^ Aberback, Brian. "New mock trial contest arises from controversy", The Record (Bergen County), February 24, 2006, accessed April 19, 2007.
- ^ Jacqueline Minneman, Cavalier Daily Associate Editor (2006). Mock Trial team wins national championship (English). The Cavalier Daily. Retrieved on September 18, 2007.
[edit] External links
- "Florida High School Mock Trial." Florida Law Related Education. 2005. Florida Law Education Association, Inc. 4 Oct. 2006.
- "Mock Trial Competition." Constitutional Rights Foundation. 2006. Constitutional Rights Foundation. 4 Oct. 2006.
- "Mock Trials." Legal Explorer. 2006. State Bar of Wisconsin. 4 Oct. 2006.
- "Mock Trial Tournament." New York State Bar Association. 4 Oct. 2006. New York State Bar Association. 4 Oct. 2006.
- "Rules of the Competition." National High School Mock Trial Championship. 2006. National High School Mock Trial Championship, Inc. 4 Oct. 2006.
- "Tennessee State High School Mock Trial Competition." TBAlink. 2006. Tennessee Bar Association. 10 Oct. 2006.
- "Free Trial Advocacy Tips for Trial Lawyers" Winning Trial Advocacy Techniques blog
- "Massachusetts High School Mock Trial" Massachusetts Bar Association. 2007. Massachusetts Bar Association. 20 Feb 2007.
- "Ohio Mock Trial Ohio Mock Trial
