Talk:Michael Poe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Ohio Portal Michael Poe is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (general): Comics creators work group Webcomics work group

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007 March 27. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

[edit] Proposed merge of Exploitation Now

Since nobody has started the discussion on this matter, allow me. I think it's a bad, bad idea. A really horrible one, actually. What I think is more welcome is simply expanding the Exploitation Now article so it is less stubby. Since it is a work of fiction it should be fairly trivial to do, what with the comic itself being a reliable source. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 19:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Let me explain why I added it. I strongly doubt that EN meets any of the WP:WEB guidelines. Much more notable comics have fallen at AfD; I wonder if even Errant Story is properly notable. I know I haven't seen any independent notable coverage of EN, but I'm not so sure about ES. --Gwern (contribs) 22:16 9 February 2007 (GMT)

I agree with Yukichigai. This is a really bad idea. I am currently updating the page with much, much, much more information. Swtrooper 14:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Iknow that I've never edited this article before, but I have to say that the comic in question is notible enough, it does meets criteria #3 of WP:WEB, what with being distributed by keenspot and all. (Justyn 20:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC))

Oppose: Exploitation now has won 2 WCCAs, it is independantly hosted and has been published. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 19:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)