From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America (Rated Start-Class) |
|
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.
|
|
[edit] Unique?
The treaty is unique in that it is the only treaty officially recognized by the United States, and the Comanche, which was made between private citizens and the Comanche, yet endorsed by the Government.
Could someone rephrase this so that it makes sense? What exactly is unique about it? That it's the only treaty with the Comanche? The only treaty between an Indian Tribe and private citizens? The only treaty which is between an Indian Tribe and private citizens and which is recognized by the US? Or is it something else? (BTW, the reference originally at the end of the lede (a link, really) does not talk about the uniqueness at all. I moved it up a sentence, to where it is more applicable.) -- 00:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Sorry, it is unique in that it is the only treaty which is between an Indian Tribe and private citizens and which is recognized by the US. JohninMaryland (talk) 13:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)