Talk:Metamorphosis (Hilary Duff album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | |
|
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)
[edit] AssessmentThe article is VERY good, and with a little work can easily become a GA. Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 21:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
[edit] Wow!
Somebody actually made an article about my album? Wow! I can't believe someone would do that! You CAN find anything on the web, can't you? --*Hil* 23:32, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, Hilary. -- Mike Garcia 05:32, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Stones compilation of the same name?
There was a Rolling Stones compilation album titled Metamorphosis released in 1975. Perhaps we should move this to Metamorphosis (Hilary Duff album)? john k 02:44, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Merging Singles
I don't believe any of the singles should be merged, because they are seperate CD's and other artists don't have their singles merged WestJet
- To quote user:FuriousFreddy: if a song article is nothing but a recounting of how the song was made, and how well it did, without explaining that it was, in some way, important and influential to the music industry, there's really no reason for it. Just write good album articles, and selected articles on the important singles and album tracks, and let's keep the encyclopedia balanced. Encyclopedias aren't supposed to be "complete"; they are supposed to provide overviews and guide users to further information on a subject if they want to go beyond the standard level. Something like a Hilary Duff fan wiki would be a fine place to have an article on every Duff song, but a general-purpose encyclopedia is not. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pop music issues and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs. Why write dozens of short articles on singles, with no chances of actual expansion short of padding and marketing-report material (chart positions), when they can be combined into one album article? Extraordinary Machine 16:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Why Not
"Why Not" was a single from The Lizzie McGuire Movie soundtrack, not this album. Extraordinary Machine 17:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dutch Top 40
How can a single have peaked at #80 on the Dutch Top 40? Salaskan 17:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SoYesterday.ogg
Image:SoYesterday.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ComeClean.ogg
Image:ComeClean.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
