Talk:Mental plane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (major fields): Philosophy of mind

	Occult Portal Mental plane is supported by WikiProject Occult in order to expand, improve, and standardize articles related to the occult. Feel free to edit the article attached to this talk page and/or become a participating member.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Text of Mental Planes, nominated for speedy deletion after placed on VfD:

The dimensional environment of the Mind, part of which resembles a three-dimensional setting of the physical plane (length, width and height), combined with the element of Time, that can sustain and support an Energy Field.

Other aspects of the Mental Plane are more Advanced beyond the crude characteristics of the Physical Plane where most humans enslave their consciousness and activities.

The Mental Plane is ABOVE the Physical Plane and Emotional Plane but BELOW the Soul or Love Plane.

• There are votes for redirect and merge. Before it gets deleted, I'm putting it here in case someone can use it in merging. It won't be me; I still think it's non-encyclopedic to the point of nonsense. -- WCFrancis 04:07, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Just because it doesnt fit in the dominant western physicalist or naturalist paradigm doesnt make it non-encyclopaedic! Since when did Wikipedia only allow those entries approved by the secular materialistic mindset? The role of Wikipedia should be to present information regardless of whether it conforms to a physicalist or a non-physicalist paradigm. The only standard should be that the entry (once it goes beyond the stub stage) is well referenced, and written from a NPOV. This was discussed and agreed on a talk on Human (i don't know the archive page). This current page is still a stub, hence there aren't yet references. M Alan Kazlev 11:36, 19 August 2005 (UTC)