Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-01-20 Quiverfull
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Mediation Cabal | |
| 2007-01-20 Quiverfull | |
| Article | Quiverfull |
|---|---|
| Status | Closed |
| Requestor | User:CyberAnth |
| Parties | User:CyberAnth & User:Grkndeacon, 216.84.48.187 and 74.129.77.217 |
| Mediator(s) | IronDuke |
| Comment | Users seem to have both agreed on a compromise version. |
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-01-20 Quiverfull
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: CyberAnth 09:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- ...Quiverfull - and see recent history of edit war.
- Who's involved?
- ...User:CyberAnth & User:Grkndeacon with suspected socks 216.84.48.187 (a seminary in Louisville) and 74.129.77.217 (a Louisville ISP)
- What's going on?
- ...User with socks has blanked controversial material from page connecting Andrea Yates as holding Quiverfull beliefs. User with socks keeps trying to omit said info or change it in violation of varied WP policies. I have tried to discuss the matter on talk pages but reverting still is ongoing.
- What would you like to change about that?
- ...Just because someone finds something unbecoming of their movement does not mean it should be excluded from WP.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- ...Your choice. My email is on.
[edit] Mediator response
I am going to contact all parties and proceed from there. IronDuke 19:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Parties have agreed on compromise. IronDuke 06:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
