User talk:Mclowes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome!
Hello, Mclowes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Nevhood 19:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[edit] Alton Towers
Thanks for the input on this article, I've been meaning to do some more work on the article myself but got sidetracked. However I'm slightly concerned, so thought it best to give you some friendly advice. All content must be verifiable, so it's better not to write content from first hand experience but to write the content from sources. Any questions just ask, thanks. One Night In Hackney 18:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Always warn!
When reverting vandalism, always remember to warn the vandals using the appropriate templates. If you need a simple revert-warn tool, plus much much more, take a look at TWINKLE. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 13:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March 2007
Hi, the recent edit you made to Alton Towers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 19:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Glass
You sent me a message saying my contribution to "Glass" was unconstructive. However, if you look at the log you will see I removed the unconstructive bit and your revert actually put it back in! I guess it's just a synchronisation problem.
-
- So I did. My humblest apologies, quite embarrassing. I must've missed the new revision when running WP:TW. Thanks for pointing it out! camelworks(Mclowes) 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brooke
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Brooke on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. camelworks(Mclowes) 18:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, but why the hell are you leaving me these type of messages? --Burntsauce
Make an effort to pay attention to what you are doing before you leave faulty warnings for people. Thanks. --Burntsauce
Ooops, my bad. Please accept my apologies, my eyes clearly became crossed across revisions. :O camelworks(Mclowes) 18:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
