Talk:Masters of Horror
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Anyone know anything about Rob Zombie's alleged episode? User:CyberGhostface
According to IMDB "The Screwfly Solution" is the 8th Episdoe. I believe this is wrong, because on the Showtime website [1] it lists them everything so far in chronological order The Screwfly Solution being 7th. Xholyrelicx 19:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Interview
I have removed the link to an interview with Andrew Deane on D3rang3d, as it is a copyright violation, and our policy per WP:EL is not to link to copyright violations. Just a heads-up to please not reinsert it into the article. It should be provided from a non-copyvio source soon. Thanks, Mak (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use removal
The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. -Mask? 23:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mastersofhorror.jpg
Image:Mastersofhorror.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shame, shame
It's a shame to see how a bunch of vandals (I'd cite their names, but they would complain against this comment), who are just college boys (if not from high school), believe themselves legal experts or Juris Doctors about intellectual property, and have vandalized the content of this page, deleting images without consensus and show disrespect to the other members efforts and contributions. It's a shame that the same wikipedia policies and guidelines that permit using the images in the articles, are always cited as pretext or excuse to destroy the member's works and efforts. When they vandalize the articles, they act against the same wikipedia policies and guidelines they claim to protect, deleting and deleting without consulting or seeking consensus.
Why am I so angry? Well, because as an horror fan (and a Masters of Horror fan) I always enjoyed visiting this page, and I were always grateful to the editors that made it possible, but, to my sorprise, now I found it without any DVD cover image and, surprisingly, even the MOH logo it threatened for deletion.
I AM a horror fan. I AM a movies fan. I AM a wikipedia fan. And I like to see the movie posters o DVD covers when I'm watching movies reviews. It's not only aestetical, but is easier to the viewer to link or relate the movie to the poster (or DVD cover, in this case).
I think that the MOH fans, the horror movies fans, should be agaist this kind of conduct. This kind of editor don't contribute to any article, don't support others members efforts at any project: they just... delete, delete, and delete. A movie fan contributes to the articles about movies, the history fan (or the guy who knows about history -MA, PhD-) contributes about history, the engineer contributes about enginnering. A contribution is an effort, that inform us about something that we want to know. --Omar1976 23:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Uh huh... college boys... the images were deleted by a robot, as a quick look at the comment before yours shows. The images were automatically deleted because they lacked information in the "fair use" field. If you re-add the images and fill in all the fields the robot will not delete them. --Frédéric Chopin 2027 02:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mastersofhorror.jpg
Image:Mastersofhorror.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mastersofhorror2.jpg
Image:Mastersofhorror2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)