Martin Durkin (television director)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Martin Durkin is a television producer and director, most prominently of television documentaries for Channel 4 in Britain. He is managing director of WAG TV, the London based independent TV production company. He has produced, directed and executive produced a wide variety of programmes covering the arts, science, history, entertainment, features and social documentaries. A number of his documentaries have caused controversies, most notably those which are critical of environmentalism. He has been described as 'the scourge of the greens' (Independent 8 March, 2007) and 'one of the environmentalists' favourite hate figures' (Independent on Sunday 4 March, 2007).

Contents 1 Documentaries 1.1 Against Nature 1.2 Equinox 1.3 The Rise and Fall of GM 1.4 The Great Global Warming Swindle 1.5 As Executive Producer 2 Political affiliations 3 References 4 External links

[edit] Documentaries

[edit] Against Nature

In 1997, Channel 4 broadcast Durkin's documentary series - Against Nature which criticized the environmental movement for being a threat to personal freedom and for crippling economic development. Christopher Dunkley of the Financial Times listed the series as one of the top ten TV highlights of the year, saying: "Against Nature is one of the most brilliantly successful and persuasive pieces of polemic it has ever been my pleasure to watch on television. Producer/director Martin Durkin sets out to show that while the greens may fancy themselves as folk heroes and rebels there is good reason to see them as timid and dangerous conservatives. The programme takes up jewel after jewel in the green crown and shows them to be fakes … Given the notorious inability of politicians to catch even the most important television programmes, it might be an idea if this one were loaded onto a cassette and screened on the Westminster monitors, on the hour, every hour, for a week or so." (Christopher Dunkley, Financial Times). Writing in the Radio Times, Polly Toynbee wrote: "It’s not often a programme takes your breath away with a truly daring political thesis. After all, television is meant to be anodyne when it comes to opinions. But Against Nature will have a great many people up in arms with rage ... This is a series to make you sit up and take notice." (Polly Toynbee, Radio Times). But environmentalists hated it. In the Times Educational Supplement, Bernard Adams wote: "Channel 4 may soon find a Green gunboat heading its way." (Bernard Adams, TES)

The UK's then broadcasting regulator the Independent Television Commission received 151 complaints from viewers and interviewees featured in the program with 4 complaints upheld. ^{[1] [2]} In its report on the series the ITC rejected 147 complaints which were mainly concerned with fairness and misrepresentation stating that "the programmes’ line that green ideologies were, at least in some respects, open to criticism on both scientific and humanitarian grounds, was a legitimate approach". It also stated that environmentalists had been permitted a fair chance to air their side of the story in the televised debates that followed the broadcast.

The ITC stated that 4 complaints were upheld because "the programmes breached the Programme Code in respect of the failure to make the four interviewees adequately aware of the nature of the programmes, and the way their contributions were edited."^[3]. For these reasons, Channel 4 later issued a public apology on prime time television.^[4]According to The Independent, Durkin "accepts the charge of misleading contributors, but describes the verdict of distortion as 'complete tosh'." ^[5]

[edit] Equinox

Durkin also produced 2 documentaries for Channel 4's science strand Equinox. In 1998 he produced "Storm in a D-Cup" which argued that the medical dangers of silicone breast implants had been exaggerated for political reasons and highlighting evidence that implants may even carry medical benefits; and in 2000 he produced The Rise and Fall of GM.

The 1998 documentary on breast implants was originally developed for the BBC but was eventually produced for Channel 4 after the BBC declined to commission it; the BBC's in-house researcher concluded that Durkin had ignored evidence contradicting his claims in the program.^[2] Criticising the program, enivornmental activist and writer George Monbiot wrote "Neither Martin Durkin nor, extraordinarily, Charles Furneaux, the commissioning editor of the science series Equinox, has a science background. They don’t need one, for science on Channel 4 has been reduced to a crude manifesto for corporate libertarianism."^[2]

[edit] The Rise and Fall of GM

Durkin's documentary which argues in favor of genetic modification was broadcast on Channel 4 on March 20th 2000, also met with complaints.^[6] Environmentalist activists organised a campaign in an effort to discredit the film. A joint letter signed by a number of scientists from the Third World was issued in protest of Durkin's claims in this documentary. ^[7] Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, a scientist featured on the program, later said of her participation in the program: "I feel completely betrayed and misled. They did not tell me it was going to be an attack on my position." ^[2] However, although broadcasting regulator Ofcom received 17 complaints about the programme none was upheld; Ofcom concluded that 'although the programme set out to be a critical analysis of the case against GM, it never-the-less gave opportunity for a number of anti-GM speakers to explain their views clearly and fairly.' [1] The film was warmly received in the scientific community as a whole.^{[citation needed]} Durkin was subsequently asked to make another film on the subject for the academic body the American Association of Plant Biology.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] The Great Global Warming Swindle

Main article: The Great Global Warming Swindle

The Great Global Warming Swindle was a 2007 documentary film which premiered on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom on March 8, 2007. The film features scientists and others who are sceptical that global warming is caused by human activity. The second part of the program examines the conditions under which one of the current theories was developed. It focuses on political pressures on those who speak out against the supposed anthropogenic causes of global warming, some of the reasons for the wide adoption of this view and the factors leading to its original development. The film also interviews sceptics who are critical of environmental policies they view as holding back developing nations from industrialising. The film has drawn wide-spread complaints ^[8][9] from the scientific community, citing numerous errors and misleading claims. Professor Carl Wunsch who appeared on the programme has since repudiated the film and compared it to propaganda^[10].Durkin responded that Wunsch had been told very explicitly the nature of the programme and now appeared to be back-tracking.

The film was praised by critics of the scientific consensus on global warming, including Andrew Bolt^[11] , Dominic Lawson^[12] and Steven Milloy^[13], and Durkin's work has been defended in an interview in Spiked^[14]. Durkin has recently given an extensive interview on his position towards environmentalism to the editor of Bedeutung, Alex Stavrakas, which will be published in January 2008 ^[15].

Further controversy followed the broadcast of the film after it emerged that Martin Durkin had fallen out with geneticist Armand Leroi (whom Durkin was due to make a documentary with), after Leroi questioned the accuracy of the data used in the film in an email to Durkin. Leroi copied the e-mail to various colleagues including Guardian journalist and Bad Science columnist Ben Goldacre and science writer and mathematics expert Simon Singh. Durkin replied to Leroi copying in the others with the single sentence: "You’re a big daft cock". Singh then sent an email to Durkin that said: "I have not paid the same attention to your programme as Armand has done, but from what I did see it is an irresponsible piece of film-making. If you can send me a copy of the programme then I will examine it in more detail and give you a more considered response...it would be great if you could engage in the debate rather just resorting to one line replies".

Durkin responded: "The IPCC's own figures show the hottest year in the past ten was 1998, and the temp has been flat-lining now for five years. If it's greenhouse gas causing the warming the rate of warming should be higher in the troposphere than on the surface. The opposite is the case. The ice core data shows that temperature change causes the level of atmospheric CO2 to change - not the other way round. Why have we not heard this in the hours and hours of shit programming on global warming shoved down our throats by the BBC?", and concluded with, "Never mind a bit of irresponsible film-making. Go and fuck yourself".^[16] Durkin later apologised for his language, saying that he had sent the e-mails when tired and had just finished making the programme, and that he was "eager to have all the science properly debated with scientists qualified in the right areas".^[17]

The film was awarded the Best Documentary trophy at the Io Isabella film festival and was shortlisted for the Best Documentary prize in the British television industry's 2008 Broadcast Awards.[2]

[edit] As Executive Producer

Martin Durkin has also executive produced a wide range of programmes. Notable productions include: ‘The Naked Pilgrim’, an architectural travelogue which followed art critic Brian Sewell’s pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela; produced for UK’s Channel Five it won the prestigious Sandford St. Martin Trust award for best programme in 2004; ‘Face of Britain’ for Channel 4, a 3 part series presented by Neil Oliver which looked at the Wellcome Trust’s DNA project profiling the ancestry of various British communities; ‘How Do They Do It?’ an engineering series for Discovery Channel; ‘Secret Intersex’, a 2 part series about intersexuality for Channel 4 which was short listed for Best Science Programme in the 2004 Royal Television Society awards^[18].

[edit] Political affiliations

Critics and supporters of Durkin's programmes have claimed he is closely involved with the Revolutionary Communist Party and its later offshoots Living Marxism (or LM magazine) and Spiked, a magazine and associated political network which promotes libertarian views.^{[19] [20] [21] [22] [23]}

Durkin has denied this, asserting that The Guardian newspaper has accused him of being on the far right, the far left and of being a 'classic liberal'.^{[citation needed]}. Brendan O'Neill of Spiked has stated:

In fact, a few people who contributed articles to LM appeared as talking heads on Against Nature. That’s all. Not as exciting as the crazed and wide-eyed web conspiracy theories make it sound, I know. Sorry.^[24]

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• The Great Global Warming Swindle at Channel 4
• Geoffrey Lean, "Global Warming: An inconvenient truth or hot air?", The Independent, March 4, 2007 [3]
• Robin McKie, "Why Channel 4 has got it wrong over climate change," The Observer, March 4, 2007 [4]
• Profile of Martin Durkin on GMWatch.org [5]
• "More digs at Durkin", The Guardian, March 22, 2000 [6]
• Friends of the Earth press release, April 2, 1998 [7]
• Independent Television Commission ruling on "Against Nature"