User talk:LuckyThracian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, LuckyThracian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. NF24(radio me!Editor review) 01:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Caligae
Copy of my question from Euryalus' Talk Page:
I recently did a copyedit of the stub article on caligae and noticed that the picture of the reconstructed sandal in the article seemed wrong. I don't dispute that it's a piece of Roman footwear but it doesn't seem robust enough to be a soldier's sandal for heavy marching (note the perforations, particularly towards the heel). I've noticed that you seem to be interested in this field (from when you commented on my AfD for "Jittelar") so I thought I'd ask your opinion - the original editor and other contributors don't seem to be about much. Also, I can't see how hobnails would be very suitable for marching on the cobbled roads that the Romans are famed for - wouldn't it be like wearing a sprigged soccer boot and carry a risk of going for six on a hard and smooth surface? Or did the legionaries carry a repertoire of gear for various terrains? LuckyThracian (Talk) 02:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm flattered you think I'd know the answer. From memory, caligae did have hobnails or similar attached to the soles to hold the leather strips together and improve traction. Their advantages over closed shoes were comfort and replacement - you could march all day and not get blisters, and when the sole wore out a legionary could make a new one himself.
- Legionaries had to provide their own leather and nails (similar to the NYPD having to buy their own guns today) and this was occasionally a source of bitterness. Their use as a weapon seems a bit unlikely - I've never seen this anywhere other than the Wikipedia article and a "creative anachronism" website. If a wounded enemy is at your feet, would you finish him with your sword or by repeatedly poking him with a hobnailed shoe?
- The concept of a legion all skating about on a smooth road surface is kind of funny - this would certainly be a disadvantage of hobnailed shoes. However, Roman roads were not that smooth - outside of major population centres most roads were corduroy if they existed at all, and if they were stone they looked like this. In established Roman towns the roads were smoother and properly paved, but legions weren't usually permitted to enter Roman towns en masse, so the problem probably didn't arise. Hope this helps, though I think you've improved the article to the best standard its likely to reach. Euryalus (talk) 03:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- My closing response copied from Euryalus' Talk Page:
-
- Thanks for your reply and the picture link (quite enlightening). Whenever I try to get into detail about this sort of thing I rediscover how little we've actually got to go on for this era. LuckyThracian (Talk) 03:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome! (to Milhist Project)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
- The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 03:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Cleanup
Well, if you want someone else to take a look at the article, you can list it at WP:MHA#REQ; but we don't mind if you assess your own work. :-) Kirill 14:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Milhist coordinators election has started
- The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Milhist Coordinator elections |
||
Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject elections. I went into it expecting to just keep my seat and was astonished to end up with the lead role. I anticipate a rather busy six months :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Haut-Koeningsbourg castle, Alsace. |
[edit] Thanks
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Citing Shakespeare
I saw your question at the help desk. I suggest you look at Hamlet which cites the play loads of times and explains at the top of the footnotes section how it is going to do so. I think there's something similar at Romeo and Juliet. Best wishes. AndyJones (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)