Lucky loser (tennis)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A lucky loser is a sports term most often used in tennis. It describes a player who loses a match in the final qualifying round of a knockout tournament, but who then enters the main draw when another player withdraws at the last minute because of illness or injury. The lucky loser then takes that player's position in the draw, regardless of rank. This can only happen prior to the first round of play, shortly before the tournament has started.

It's not common in male tennis within Association of Tennis Professionals tournament that a lucky loser wins a tournament, Christian Minussi did it in 1991 in Sao Paolo and Sergiey Stakhovsky in Zagreb 2008[1]. Total 5 has done it since 1978, [2]

[edit] Ethical issues and change in policy

In tennis, the rule for choosing a player to enter the main draw as a lucky loser was formerly as follows: from all players eliminated in the final round of qualifying, the highest-ranked player in the ATP or WTA rankings was the first one to enter the draw, followed by the second highest-ranked player and so on (if more players withdrew before the start of the tournament).

Prior to the 2005 Wimbledon Championships, American player Justin Gimelstob faced George Bastl from Switzerland in the final qualification round. Gimelstob, who was the highest-ranked player remaining in the qualifying tournament, aggravated a chronic back complaint during his second qualification match against Vladimir Voltchkov. Gimelstob planned to withdraw before the match with Bastl, and informed his opponent of his intent. However, officials suggested that Gimelstob play at least one game, as it was almost certain someone would withdraw from the main draw before the tournament started, giving Gimelstob a good chance of getting a berth as a lucky loser (as well as giving him time for his back to recover).^[1] Gimelstob did indeed enter the main draw as a lucky loser after the withdrawal of Andre Agassi, reaching the third round, where he lost to Lleyton Hewitt.

While Gimelstob's behavior was not generally considered unethical, it was nonetheless clear that any player in his position would have little incentive to play a competitive match. For example, a high-ranking player paired against a lower-ranked friend might deliberately lose the match to help his friend gain entry to the tournament, if the first player had already clinched a lucky loser spot. The possibility of bribery was also a concern.

Shortly thereafter, a new policy was introduced. Since 2006, the four highest ranked players to lose in the last round of qualification in Grand Slam tournaments take part in a four-way random draw, the results of which are used to determine the order in which each player will enter the main draw. Consequently, if only one main draw spot for a lucky loser is available, the highest-ranked loser has just a 25% chance of entering the draw, instead of 100% as in the past. This element of uncertainty helps to ensure that final-round qualifying matches remain competitive.

[edit] References