Talk:Louisville Zoo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Biased?
This article seems very biased. The proud statements on the Wikipedia page are terribly imbalanced. Is this not the same zoo that was so happy with itself after they merely painted trees on the walls of one of the animal houses to 'simulate' a supposedly natural environment? Is this the same small zoo that has the same small Polar Bear exhibit that it's had for years? This article needs more statistics, because from what I've seen [disturbing, I must say] I can't believe this zoo is as wonderful as the Wikipedia article insinuates. Has it changed dramatically within the last five or ten years? This article simply needs more statistics [balanced] and the tone needs to be neutralized. Gemini79 04:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's not a life or death topic, and Rome wasn't built in a day. There are tons of articles that are brochure-like. Ultimately, they will be corrected. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 06:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)