Lightweight rail
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lightweight rail is a particular class of railway characterized by low train weight. The term is a mode of expression for discussing the environmental importance of low train weight, and the implications of this concept will be discussed in the following. The term Lightweight rail should not be confused with the common term light rail, which only partly implies low weight, but primarily implies the ability to merge with city traffic, in contrast to heavy rail, which requires a separate right-of-way. Light rail has only partly explored the potentials of low weight, but enough to be able to negotiate the grades in sloping cities and other terrains it has to adapt to.
Contents |
[edit] Can trains be light?
The minimum weight for trains running on the ground was demonstrated in February 2007 when a train was derailed by snow masses on a Norwegian mountain line. The train — called a Signature train — consisted of motorized wagons, each with 72 seats and weighting 54 tons. A local train expert told the media that he had warned against using such a light train, as it could slide like a snowboard and derail. A heavier locomotive, which could push an efficient snow plow, should be used in front.
In warmer climates, where snow masses may be disregarded, trains must still be built to survive collisions with cattle and other large animals, as well as crossing road vehicles. If the track were lifted 4-5 meters above the ground, resting on pillars, both snow mass disturbance and collision danger would be virtually eliminated, so now lightweight technology could be employed. A positive feedback is encountered here: Rail elevation enables light trains, and light trains are easy to elevate above the ground. Such positive feedback situations can create quantum leaps in technology, and this effect seems to be effective here.
An empty lightweight wagon for 70 passengers could weigh only 5 tons[citation needed], against 40 tons for the railway wagon. If the total weight is used, with motorized bogies, it becomes 6.4 tons, but this weight can be compared with a 40 ton wagon among 6-7 such wagons pulled by an 80 ton locomotive. In both cases the beamway train has only 1/8 of the weight. The 70 passengers in the railway train have a 25 meter long wagon, while the 70 in the beamway train have 16-18 meters, so it may be more correct to use the ratio 1/6. If the weight of the passengers equals the weight of a light wagon, the ratio becomes 2/7.
The strongest forces at the safe altitudes would be those from the wind and the passengers. Special circumstances like unusual transport or construction activities could impose obstacles, but they are easy to detect (by ultrasound echo or radar) and require no recognition capability — just automatic braking. This simplification of the environment makes it possible to use driverless and computer-controlled trains. Another advantage of the elevated track is that the power line can easily be built into it, without being a danger for people or animals, and without being disturbed by rain or snow.
[edit] Environmental implications
The advantages of reduced weight become evident in three areas:
- Reduction of energy consumption and exerted forces. Energy losses caused by rolling friction are reduced when the train weight is reduced. But at higher speeds the air resistance becomes more important, and this is independent of the train weight, depending primarily upon the cross-section area of the train. A lighter train exerts smaller forces during braking and turning, and this will in return enable lighter and cheaper track designs.
- Reduction of the ground leveling required. A heavy train needs extensive ground leveling and expensive bridges. A light-train track on pillars can negotiate considerable terrain unevenness simply by varying the pillar height.
- Openness for crossing traffic under an elevated railway. A conventional railway will form a barrier along its path. It may have some crossings for roads, but will still be a barrier for the local population or animal life. An elevated track with 2x2 meter openings will enable people and most animals to pass and feel unhindered. 4-5 meter high and 5+ meter wide openings will enable frequent road and street crossings.
[edit] Elevated rail designs
A conventional railway track is so wide that the train can easily balance on top of it, and this works fine on a flat surface. But when the track is to be elevated on top of pillars, it should be designed like a stiff beam. This means: It should be thick vertically, but narrow. A wide beam will be heavy, expensive, and often annoyingly overshadowing. The train should not try to balance on top of a wide beam, but achieve stability by wrapping partly around the upper part of a narrower beam. We now have a straddling monorail, also called the Alweg type train.
The train itself can be lightweight, but the track — normally a concrete beam resting on concrete pillars — has some problems:
- The beam becomes a barrier between the train and the ground below, so that the train cannot have an elevator for arriving and departing passengers, but needs expensive raised stations at all stops — unless the railway has a reserved area allowing the track to go low at stations. (The elevator also functions as a sluice mechanism including a weight, so that train overloading can be automatically prevented.)
- Having trains on the top makes it difficult for the track to take long jumps by having the steel beam suspended under a catenary cable — like an ordinary suspension bridge is suspended under two.
So we let the train hang under a steel beam, and now we have a suspended monorail, also called a SAFEGE-type monorail, or a beamway.
[edit] Suspended beamway trains
Steel beams held up by metal poles give a lightweight track — at least in terms of volume and visual disturbance, and when the poles can be 30-40 meters apart, the train can act as a tram or bus in a dense city. It can follow a road just above it — also on bridges — and may get a quite straight route even if the road curves somewhat back and forth — by taking shortcuts over sidewalks, fences, gardens etc.. It may not seem plausible that real trains can run on long and not very stiff beams, but a long train will have much of its weight in the strong track parts near poles, and the train parts in the weak beam parts midway between poles, need not strain seriously if the train has some stiffness — preferably a dynamically adjustable one.
A beamway's bogies run inside the hollow beam, so the wheels always have a dry and clean path. The exposed environment of the straddling train, on the other hand, can collect some snow — enough to prevent high-speed operation. And such a top surface is likely to invite birds for a rest with a view -- and a massacre.
(A third suspension alternative is to let the train ride on the side of a tall beam which can carry trains on both sides, but then it will be difficult to avoid heavy loadings of the wheels — which should not be small if high speed is wanted.[1][2]) In addition to the wheels inside the beam, wheels can roll under the bottom of the beam. If the two sets of wheels are pressed together, hillclimbing abilities are greatly improved. Brakes which likewise pinch the bottom of the beam, will be far more efficient than traditional wheel brakes. When the track is a relatively compact beam, it becomes possible to move it in various ways:
- To swing it up or sideways where it crosses e.g. a river with boat traffic
- To displace one end of a beam — for switching between two or more alternative lines
- To let the beamway be held by floaters on the sea — even though the tides will tilt the transition beam a little
- To let a beam be held by an elevator mechanism which can lift/lower the beam with a train to a different altitude
- To let a beam be moved sideways on two parallel tracks which are perpendicular to the beam — so that the beamway can scan an area for e.g. agricultural purposes
- To let the beam be held by racks standing on the ground — for a provisional railway line
[edit] Transferable passenger cabins
When the passenger cabin is light, it becomes feasible to make it detachable, so that it can be transferred to other transport systems. This gives potentials for the many flexibility advantages long reaped by container transport of cargo. But passenger cabin transfers must be fast, and without experiences of dangling under cranes. The beamway has unique potentials in this respect, because its beam can lead to a position very close above other vehicles/platforms, such as a boat deck, a flat freight wagon on conventional railway, or a trailer-like bus. Only centimeters/inches of lowering will be required for transferring the cabin to the recipient, so this would hardly give the passengers any experience of dangling under a crane.[3]
[edit] Potentials for advanced technology
When the weight is low, it is much easier to replace those awkward wheels with advanced levitation technology like magnetic levitation — maglev. Its use in a beamway beam is also simplified by factors like:
- A clean environment: no dust, debris and snow — just clean metal
- No stability problems when the train is hanging under the levitation mechanism — which is even confined between steel walls
- Smaller dimensions
The beam tolerates little loading by levitation mechanisms along the track, but the passive coils used by the Inductrack system may be light enough. The interior of the beam also facilitates another stable levitation method: Windsurfing, either by Hovercraft-style air pumps, or simply by sliding passively on the air cushion obtained under airfoils after rolling on wheels up to a high enough speed. When there is no contact between wheels and the beam, conventional motors can't be used, and must be replaced by alternative propulsion — probably the linear motor, which may be integrated in the maglev mechanism. [4]
[edit] Low weight equals low capacity?
For moving large pieces of cargo, these lightweight railways (without alternative heavyweight transport nearby) would be unsatisfactory. But for moving people and light cargo, a bidirectional beamway line could have less than one minute between trains, if it were not for the irregularity introduced at stops. If heavyweight railway entails having to do with single-track operation instead of double-track, the long train intervals make competition with a stream of light trains impossible — particularly if factors like the user-friendliness of short departure intervals, and the capacity decrease caused by a disabled train, are taken into account. Driverless lightweight trains may be less personnel-demanding — particularly if ticketing and security permit trains to be fully unmanned like elevators.
[edit] Psychology
These new railway types constitute a technological paradigm shift likely to elicit enthusiasm, but this entails a danger of destructive polarization between enthusiasts and skeptics — who generally have the power and money. It is very important to speak in terms of the relevant properties: that low weight gives various environmental and operational advantages. The names of the new railway types should not be used unless necessary, as this would tend to elicit visions of only amusement park use.
[edit] Sources
[edit] External links
- The Monorail Society — assorted monorail information
- Beamway concept for private cabins
- Beamway concept for trains/buses
