Talk:Lamprey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life | ||||||
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. | ||||||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
||||||
|
|||||||
 |
Lamprey appears on The Fish Portal as the "Selected fish of the month" for April 2007. |
Contents |
[edit] picture
could someone get a picture of a lamprey besides its mouth as a portrait pic? i admit it's freaky and cool, but that's not the aim for an encyclopedia entry.
-
- Is this OK? --83.253.26.39 23:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Business Question
Sould Great Lakes lampreys be harvested and sold in SW Europe? --D. G. Borkowski
Lampray mouth removed, because it makes some people feel bad in certain ways, to view it.
[edit] Locations
They are found only in temperate regions, except for Africa- that's why they're not in tropical regions? How does this make sence?
[edit] minor edit
I edited the piece on effects of lamprocide. Harmful effects on other species have been documented 01:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I deleted 'horrifying'; no basis, subjective, pointless.Dmccabe
[edit] confusion about classification
This article cites a book about modern fish saying that classifies lampreys as the sole member of the class Cephalaspidomorphi, so the article for that class now redirects to the lamprey article. But the name Cephalaspidomorphi was coined to include a group of fossil armored fish, the cephalaspids, which in turn was named for the genus Cephalaspis. The cephalaspids are usually regarded as a synonym or subgroup of the Osteostraci, which is entirely extinct. Some other orders of fossil jawless fish have also been included in the Cephalaspidomorphi.
Now, it may be that lampreys are the sole surviving cephalaspidomorphs, since their anatomy of the lamprey brain resembles that preserved in fossil skulls of Osteostracans. (The exact relations of lampreys to other jawless fish are disputed, see below.) But it makes no sense to have a separate article about cephalaspids (Osteostraci) while assuming that Cephalaspidomorphi is synonymous with lampreys, which may be the sole surviving twig of that group.
The article on Agnatha compounds the confusion by separately listing as subgroups the Osteostraci (which does not mention it belongs to Cephalaspidomorphi), Cephalaspidomorphi (which redirects to lampreys), and Petromyzontidae (which rightly redirects to lampreys).
Since some workers do not regard the lampreys as close relatives of the cephalaspids (see the Tree of Life link below) and reject their classification as Cephalaspidomorphi, it might be best to classify them as Petromyzontiformes within the Vertebrata and leave it at that for now. I'll try to clear up these articles over the next few days, but I hope someone more familiar with fossil fish will jump in.
Here are some external links:
- Palaeos site's take on Cephalaspidomorphi
- Tree of Life regarding lampreys
- Tree of Life regarding osteostracans
Cephal-odd 14:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Older Fossil Found
Scientists recently discovered a fossil about three times older than the one mentioned in the article.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061025185208.htm
I'll let someone else edit the article. I'm not good at pretentious encyclopedia prose. The article cited may have some other useful ionfo. as well pertaining to this article.
-Adam S.
- Article says: "A few months later, in the 27 October issue of Nature, an even older fossil lamprey, dated 360 Mya, [...]" What is "360 Mya"? Tempshill 19:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- MYA is short for "million years ago", as is stated in the linked article. The page has been editied with this clerification. 67.103.18.138 19:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] vandalism
It appears we have someone who is not fond of these beasties and is taking it out on the page. I apologize if any of my reverting has removed anything useful, but there were too many pieces to fix by editing so I simply saved an older version back to the main page.Dmccabe 03:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Does it have predators?
Article should answer the question: Do lampreys have predators? Either in the larval stage or as adults? Tempshill 19:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] harmful?
OK if they can't attack what does that do to the story of Vedius Pollio and Augustus, I would like to hear more about the frequency of attacks, results and if that has any relationship to the truth of the story. 4.227.154.188 20:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Can they attack humans in the water in any way?
- They could. However, it's highly unlikely. “There's really no risk of sea lamprey attacking humans. The risk would almost be negligible for a sea lamprey to encounter a person and then for that sea lamprey to actually attach to someone that's out there swimming in Lake Superior.” [1] Steviedpeele 02:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not true, me and my brother hunt lampreys in rivers where I live, and we both got bitten by one. They hurt really bad. They just suck on you and don't let go, and not to leave out the fact how they have razor sharp teeth!
Question - Do they kill the fish they feed on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.31.89 (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dorsal Fin?
The physical description says it has no dorsal fin, but the diagram shows two dorsal fins, labeled as dorsal fins. Maybe it should say there's no ... uh ... whatever the belly fin is called. Caudal fin?
[edit] Larval Stage
More should be written about the larval stage of lampreys. A picture would be good too. --Savant13 13:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
