User talk:Krawi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome!
Hello, Krawi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —--Complex (de) 11:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your sig
Just a heads up, but I think your sig is malfunctioning. It looks all messed up on WP:AIV. --Haemo 08:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- uups, thanks, I changed it. --Krawi (de) talk 08:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] your signature
Hey your sig doesn't come out quite right. The code around the user talk part doesn't work, or something.
- Bah, I'm slow.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 08:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for leaving me a note, I changed it already ;) --Krawi (de) talk 08:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your reversion of animal
I'm looking at the animal article and something doesn't seem quite right - it seems smaller than usual. Now, looking back through the history of a wiki to see what has gone wrong is a time consuming job. Ideally we should have someone clueful watching each and every article to make sure things like this never happen. But it's basically an anarchy unless we set such a system up, so stuff does happen, and quite often. I've managed to trace down the history of a large missing chunk to what seems to be one of your reversions - the entire section 'groups of animals' seems to have been lost, and it seems to be because you only reverted part of the vandalism. Here is the diff: [1].
Dealing with vandalism can be difficult, but please ensure you take care of it completely. It's extremely annoying to see vandals get away with so much damage all because of a small mistake. Thanks, Richard001 01:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC).
- thanks for the note. It seems like my revert happened at the same time as the next deletion of the IP. So my revert was only applied to the first deletion and not to the second deletion. But as my edit was the last edit in the article, I was shown as the last editor - and I had no reason for thinking that something went wrong with my revert. Do you have any idea how this situation might be avioded? --Krawi (de) talk 12:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
