User talk:Ke5crz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Ke5crz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 04:50, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Archives
February 2007
March 2007
Contents |
[edit] Re: Vandalism
My edits were absolutely not vandalism. Read the article, and read my edit summary. Prop 2 is mentioned three times in a terribly redundant fashion, and I boldy corrected it. I need to wait a little while so I don't break the 3RV rule, but I will be putting my edits back in. Thank you for indulging me.
71.238.69.7 18:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Reverted awhile back (Ke5crz 09:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Removing Bell Operating Companies
Removing the Bell Operating Companies from the AT&T template is completely unnecessary. The Bell Operating Companies, along with the holding companies AT&T acquired are assets of the company. Removing them simply gives the impression that they are no longer a part of AT&T. The Bell System template is meant to incorporate all of the former assets of American Telephone & Telegraph, as this was a historic company. Having the Bell Operating Companies within the AT&T and Verizon templates specifies where they are today. KansasCity 20:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- I love history as much as any of my fellow old-time dingalings, but am uncertain why an article like Ohio Bell ought to fill something like 80% of its page with two navigation boxes, which in turn are more than half duplicate links to the same articles. The argument against is easy for me to see: These large and duplicative templates take up screen space (and for slow connections, time) and bring little benefit to the reader. Well, benefit is not obvious to me, anyway. There must be a cogent counter argument or someone wouldn't so industriously insert these things, I'm just failing to see significant benefits that wouldn't come just as well with a few words about the old days and a simple link to Bell System. Jim.henderson 06:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image source problem with Image:4kids updated.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:4kids updated.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi sir, There is no any source information, Please give it and remove the tag. Thanks!--OsamaK 07:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Future Web service
Template:Future Web service has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Kakofonous (talk) 00:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
