Talk:John Knox (meteorologist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article related to meteorology and/or specific weather events is part of WikiProject Meteorology and Weather Events, an attempt to standardize and improve all articles related to weather or meteorology. You can help! Visit the project page or discuss an article at its talk page.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

A fact from John Knox (meteorologist) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 28 February 2008.

[edit] reference

The reference ^[1] does not appear to support any assertion in the first line. I will shortly remove it. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Similarly, the reference ^[2] does not appear to support the assertion about numerical analysts and I will shortly remove it. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 09:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Standard formula

What's the fuss about? The formula is pretty much standard... It is well known that $(1+ a/x)^x \rightarrow e^a$ as $x$ increases. This applies that to $e \equiv e^{1/2}/e^{-1/2}$ , which is used in the standard bilinear transform. LachlanA (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)