User talk:JimmyGuano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, JimmyGuano, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ≈ jossi ≈ 22:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] London
hmm, I think you are wrong. The City of London and the City of Westminster are now historical parts of the city that is London, so it is a capital city. Justinc 00:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- if you want to discuss the wording of the London article (apparently based on your views on Manchester) please discuss it in Talk:London first. Justinc 00:28, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's a good point. Do you want to post your first message here there and I'll respond to it publically?JimmyGuano 00:37, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- I had already put a note there about why I reverted you pointing at Talk:City of Manchester#Accuracy and the London Issue, so anyone seeing the changes could be clear You are quite welcome to discuss the issues there, or under a new heading. Everything on wikipedia is public; if you want to copy my message you can. I think these issues are interesting, and should be discussed. Justinc 00:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- That's a good point. Do you want to post your first message here there and I'll respond to it publically?JimmyGuano 00:37, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I've posted the conurbation issue there (you got your own back on the edit conflict while I was doing it :)). The "capital city" thing is comparatively trivial, really.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- You should get a good response from that question. I'm going to bed now, its late. Justinc 01:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] William Bidlake
Thank you for adding an article on William Bidlake. He was on my list to do, so you have saved me some work. I have added some entries to the list of works: Grade I and II* only. I have been adding links to the English Heritage Images of England database in my articles so have included links in Bidlake too. Although IoE is full of typing errors I reckon it is still useful as a resource. I hope you approve. Oosoom 00:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- No that's a great idea. I've done the same with the Charles Bateman article I've just created --JimmyGuano 04:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Poussin-TancredandErminia.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Poussin-TancredandErminia.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DesmondMorrisCourtship.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DesmondMorrisCourtship.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] welcome "Jack"
- ...that Samuel Lines students of Art in Birmingham lessons' started at 5 a.m.? by JimmyGuano OK to be on the front page in next 3-5 days? Victuallers (talk) 13:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me JimmyGuano (talk) 17:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
 |
On 20 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Samuel Lines, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Gatoclass (talk) 08:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] David Prentice
Actually the David Prentice (b. 1943) who is currently doing landscape paintings and is the artist whose website you linked [1] is the same David Prentice who during the 1960s showed his Monochromatic abstract paintings at Park Place Gallery, and who was considered a Lyrical Abstractionist painter during the late 1960s. During the mid 1980s he gave up abstraction for landscape painting and he moved to Japan, part of the time. He's American and travels between New York and Japan. I hope this helps. Modernist (talk) 13:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- During the 1960s he became known for his monochromatic white paintings, and in group exhibitions on his bio in 1972 he had a 2-man show in LA with his white paintings and Ad Reinhardt's black paintings. His 1960s abstractions were like the backgrounds in his paintings Flock III, and Smile, (on his website). Modernist (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
