ebooksgratis.com

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
Talk:Jim Duffy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Jim Duffy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Periods at the end of items

Jtdirl has added periods to the end of the disambiguation entries. When I reverted that change, he or she re-reverted me with the rather cryptic comment:

rv not at the end of bullet points. But yes where a bullet point is followed be a sentence, which is the case here.

According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):

  • Entries should nearly always be sentence fragments. When the entry forms a complete sentence, do not include commas or periods at the end of the line.

Either the entry is a sentence fragment, in which case it should not end with a period, or it isn't a sentence fragment, in which case the Manual of Style explicitly tells us not to end it with a period.

I am removing the periods from the items. I ask Jtdirl to try to explain why he or she believes that a period should end a entry.

DLJessup (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

It is called English. Where a bullet point consists of a small number of words, usually five or less , then it is treated under bullet point rules. Where it goes beyond that it is not a sentence fragment but a sentence without a verb. As such it is treated as a sentence for the purposes of capitalisation, grammar, commas, and periods. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 12:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

FearÉIREANN:

First of all, a minor point. According to http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sentence:

sen·tence (sĕntəns) n.
  1. A grammatical unit that is syntactically independent and has a subject that is expressed or, as in imperative sentences, understood and a predicate that contains at least one finite verb.

To the best of my knowledge, every English grammarian defines a sentence as having a subject and a predicate, and the predicate must include a verb. The subject may be implicit, but the predicate must be explicit. Thus, a “sentence without a verb” is an oxymoron.

Moving on to the substance of your comment, you pull some rules out of thin air, offering no citation, simply claiming that, “It is called English.” I think I'll stick with a Manual of Style that both of us can read and that, if you think is wrong in some way, you can try to change.

DLJessup (talk) 11:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -