Jain vegetarianism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jain vegetarianism is the diet of the Jains, the followers of Jainism. It is the most radical form of religiously motivated diet regulation in the Indian subcontinent.
Like in Hinduism and Buddhism, Jain objections to the eating of meat and fish are based on the principle of nonviolence (ahimsa, literally "non-injuring"). Every act by which a person directly or indirectly supports killing or injury is seen as violence (himsa), which creates harmful karma. The aim of ahimsa is to prevent the accumulation of such karma.[1] The extent to which this intention is put into effect varies greatly among Hindus, Buddhists and Jains. Jains consider nonviolence to be the most essential religious duty for everyone (ahiṃsā paramo dharmaḥ, a statement often inscribed on Jain temples).[2] It is an indispensable condition for liberation from the cycle of reincarnation,[3] which is the ultimate goal of all Jain activities. Jains share this goal with Hindus and Buddhists, but their approach is particularly rigorous and comprehensive. Their scrupulous and thorough way of applying nonviolence to everyday activities, and especially to food, shapes their entire lives and is the most significant hallmark of Jain identity.[4] A side effect of this strict discipline is the exercise of asceticism, which is strongly encouraged in Jainism for lay people as well as for monks and nuns.[5]
Contents |
[edit] Practice
- For Jains vegetarianism (lacto-vegetarianism)is mandatory. Food which contains even small particles of the bodies of dead animals or eggs is absolutely unacceptable.[6] Some Jain scholars and activists support veganism.
- Jains go out of their way so as not to hurt even small insects and other tiny animals,[7] because they are convinced that harm caused by carelessness is as reprehensible as harm caused by deliberate action.[8] Hence they take great pains to make sure that no minuscule animals are injured by the preparation of their meals and in the process of eating and drinking.[9]
- Traditionally Jains have been prohibited from drinking unfiltered water.
- Jains make considerable efforts not to injure plants in everyday life as far as possible. They admit that plants must be destroyed for the sake of food, but they only accept such violence inasmuch as it is indispensable for human survival, and there are special instructions for preventing unnecessary violence against plants.[10] Some Jains don’t eat plants and plant parts that grow underground, such as potatoes, onions, roots and tubers, because tiny life forms are injured when the plant is pulled up and because the bulb is seen as a living being, as it is able to sprout.[11]
- Honey is forbidden, as its collection would amount to violence against the bees.[12]
- Food items that have started to decay are prohibited.
[edit] Historical background
When Mahavira revived and reorganized the Jain movement in the 6th or 5th century BCE[13], ahimsa was already an established, strictly observed rule.[14] Parshva, a famous Jain leader (Tirthankar) whom modern Western historians consider to be a historical figure,[15] lived in about the 8th century BCE[16] and founded a community to which Mahavira’s parents belonged.[17] Parshva’s followers vowed to observe ahimsa; this obligation was part of their "Fourfold Restraint" (caujjama dhamma).[18] Mahavira adopted it into his code of conduct.
In the times of Mahavira and in the following centuries, Jains criticized Buddhists and followers of the Vedic religion or Hindus for negligence and inconsistency in the implementation of ahimsa. In particular, they strongly objected to the Vedic tradition of animal sacrifice with subsequent meat eating and to the hunting.[19]
Some western authors have interpreted the texts in different way to show that ancient Jain ascetics accepted meat as alms if the animal had not been specifically killed for them.[20] If this is correct then they applied the same standard as early Buddhists. Some passages in two of the earliest Svetambara Jain texts, the Acaranga Sutra and the Dasaveyaliya, have been interpreted as regulations for specific types of meat and bones which were considered to be acceptable alms.[21] This can also be interpreted at references to fruits and seeds. Another Svetambara text, the Viyahapannatti, tells a story where Mahavira himself eats the "Kukutmansa" which may be interpreted as meat of a cock.[22] Kutkutmansa is also interpreted as a fleshy fruit of a plant. Medieval Jain commentators of these passages interpreted them in the literal meaning (meat eating), but also mentioned the opinion that the offensive words had different meanings, some of which did not refer to animals, and hence the contents were compatible with vegetarianism.[23] Jains point out the absurdity of such interpretations which are totally inconsistent with the ancient texts and practices. Jains, who are strict vegetarians, do not accept the interpretations of western scholars.[24]
[edit] References
- ^ Laidlaw, James: Riches and Renunciation. Religion, economy, and society among the Jains, Oxford 1995, p. 26-30, 191-195.
- ^ Dundas, Paul: The Jains, second edition, London 2002, p. 160; Wiley, Kristi L.: Ahimsa and Compassion in Jainism, in: Studies in Jaina History and Culture, ed. Peter Flügel, London 2006, p. 438; Laidlaw p. 153-154.
- ^ Hemacandra, Yogashastra 2.31.
- ^ Laidlaw p. 154-160; Jindal, K.B.: An epitome of Jainism, New Delhi 1988, p. 74-90; Tähtinen, Unto: Ahimsa. Non-Violence in Indian Tradition, London 1976, p. 110; Dundas p. 176-177.
- ^ Dundas p. 187-192, 199-200; Laidlaw p. 153-159.
- ^ Laidlaw p. 166-169; Tähtinen p. 37.
- ^ Jindal p. 89; Laidlaw p. 54, 154-155, 180.
- ^ Sutrakrtangasutram 1.8.3; Uttaradhyayanasutra 10; Tattvarthasutra 7.8; Dundas p. 161-162; Granoff p. 32-35.
- ^ Sangave, Vilas Adinath: Jaina Community. A Social Survey, second edition, Bombay 1980, p. 260-261; Tähtinen p. 109.
- ^ Lodha, R.M.: Conservation of Vegetation and Jain Philosophy, in: Medieval Jainism: Culture and Environment, New Delhi 1990, p. 137-141; Tähtinen p. 105; Dundas p. 106.
- ^ Laidlaw p. 156-157, 167-170; Sangave p. 260.
- ^ Hemacandra: Yogashastra 3.37; Laidlaw p. 166-167; Tähtinen p. 109.
- ^ the traditional dating of Mahavira’s death is 527 BCE.
- ^ Goyal, S.R.: A History of Indian Buddhism, Meerut 1987, p. 83-85; Asim Kumar Chatterjee : A comprehensive history of Jainism, vol. 1, Calcutta 1978, p. 14
- ^ Dundas p. 19, 30; Tähtinen p. 132.
- ^ Dundas p. 30 suggests the 8th or 7th century; the traditional chronology places him in the late 9th or early 8th century, Chatterjee p. 15.
- ^ Acaranga Sutra 2.15; Chatterjee p. 20-21.
- ^ Sthananga Sutra 266; Tähtinen p. 132; Goyal p. 83-84, 103.
- ^ Dundas p. 160, 234, 241; Wiley p. 448; Granoff, Phyllis: The Violence of Non-Violence: A Study of Some Jain Responses to Non-Jain Religious Practices, in: "Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies" 15 (1992) p. 1-43; Tähtinen p. 8-9.
- ^ Alsdorf, Ludwig: Beiträge zur Geschichte von Vegetarismus und Rinderverehrung in Indien, Wiesbaden 1962, p. 564-570; Dundas p. 177; Jain, Jagdishchandra: Life in Ancient India as Depicted in the Jain Canon and Commentaries, second edition, New Delhi 1984, p. 171
- ^ Acaranga Sutra 2.1.10.5-6; Dasaveyaliya 5.1.73 and 5.1.84-86.
- ^ Viyahapannatti, Shataka 15
- ^ Shilanka in his commentary on the Acaranga Sutra (completed in 872 CE; non-vegetarian interpretation), Haribhadra in his commentary on the Dasaveyaliya (8th century CE; both interpretations), Abhayadeva in his commentary on the Viyahapannatti (11th century CE; both interpretations); the relevant passages are quoted by Alsdorf p. 566-568. See also Jain p. 171-172, Dundas p. 177.
- ^ Alsdorf p. 564, 568-569.
[edit] See also
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
